Strengthening
Head Start: What the Evidence Shows U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
| June 2003
"When the school readiness of the nation's poor children is assessed,
it becomes clear that Head Start is not eliminating the gap in educational
skills and knowledge needed for school. Head Start is not fully achieving
its stated purpose of "promot[ing] school readiness by enhancing the
social and cognitive development of low-income children."
A
Head Start for Poor Children? Heritage Foundation | Krista Kafer | May 2003
"Throughout the past three and a half decades, the federal government
has attempted to address the achievement gap through Head Start, Title I
of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, and other programs. Yet there
is no clear evidence that these programs have helped poor children gain
any advantage that can be maintained over time."
Early
Childhood Intervention Programs: What Do We Know? Brookings Roundtable on Children | Janet Currie
| April 2000
"It is disappointing that numerous studies have not produced more consistent
evidence of the long-term effectiveness (or lack of effectiveness) of early
intervention. The available evidence sheds less light on the wisdom of establishing
a universal public preschool program."
Prekindergarten
Benchmarks for Language and Literacy: Progress Made and Challenges to be
Met National Institute for Early Education Research
| M.S. Burns, K. Midgette, D. Leong and E. Bodrova
"This paper examines the use of benchmarks for pre-k language and literacy,
provides samples of current national and state standards, and offers key
points for the development of effective benchmarks."
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"