Small
Schools: Great Strides Bank Street College of Education | Patricia Wasley
Study of Chicago small schools, and its achieved goals of designing "small,
intimate learning communities where students are well known and can be pushed
and encouraged by adults who care for and about them," reducing student
isolation, reducing student achievement gaps, and encouraging teachers to
use talents for student learning."
Jack
and the Giant School New Rules Project | Stacey Mitchell
"Higher graduation rates, less violence, a sense of belonging instead
of alienation: the case for small schools is supported by mountains of evidence
and a growing number of innovative models."
Dollars
and Sense: The Cost Effectiveness of Small Schools Rural School and Community Trust; Knowledge Works
Foundation | Barbara Kent Lawrence
"Summarizes research on the educational and social benefits of small
schools and the negative effects of large schools on students, teachers,
and members of the community As the research shows, measuring the
cost of education by graduates rather than by all students who go through
the system suggests that small schools are a wise investment."
An
Overview of Smaller Learning Communities in High Schools U.S. Department of Education | 2001
"This background paper is designed to help policymakers and school
leaders use the new [federal] Smaller Learning Communities program to implement
small school strategies in large high schools and within school districts."
Are
Small Schools Better? School Size Considerations for Safety and Learning WestEd | Joan McRobbie | October 2001
"Outlines key research findings and looks at what the research says
about why size appears to make a difference, how small is small enough,
effective approaches to downsizing, and key barriers. Finally, it offers
policy implications and recommendations."
Downsizing
Schools in Big Cities U.S. Department of Education | March 1996
"Reviews the current movement to downsize urban schools to help educators
decide whether and why to pursue such a move, and to indicate which models
appear most promising."
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"