Putting
Value-Added to the Test: A Value Added Model for California Pacific Research Institute | Harold T. Doran
and Lance T. Izumi | June 2004
A value-added model as suggested will result in better evaluation of policy
and programs, promotion of better instruction, better measurement of school
effectiveness, and improvement of teacher professional development.
Indispensable
Tests: How a Value-Added Approach to School Testing Could Identify and Bolster
Exceptional Teaching Lexington Institute | Robert Holland
"A technique of using test data to determine the value that teachers
add to the learning of each student - that is, how much they help the child
progress academically - could become an important tool for building better
teachers and better schools. Value-added assessment makes it possible to
isolate the impact of the individual teacher and to respond with appropriate
rewards or corrective training."
Assessing
Value-Added Assessment National Center for Policy Analysis | April 11,
2002
"Instead of comparing a student with others as norm-referenced tests
do, or solely against an established standard, value-added assessment measures
how far the student has progressed at the end of the school year compared
to the start of the school year."
Value-Added
Assessment: An Accountability Revolution Thomas B. Fordham Foundation | J.E. Stone
"What value-added assessment offers is a means whereby citizens, policymakers,
and school administrators can accurately determine how much schools, school
systems, and individual teachers are contributing to the attainment of expected
achievement levels irrespective of the students they were assigned."
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"