Dr. Sylvia P. Mundy, Commissioner
Department of Employment Security
Mail Stop: 6000
Olympia WA 98507-9046
Dear Commissioner Mundy:
This is a follow up to my letter of 12 November 2003 regarding legislative
intent in implementing 2ESB 6097.
I refer your agency to the bill reports which clearly show that the maximum
of twenty-six weeks for benefits was not a floating target but a maximum.
The Final Bill Report created 12 June 2003 and revised 22
July 2003 states: "When the unemployment rate reaches six and eight-tenths
of a percent, the maximum duration for benefits is twenty-six weeks."
The Senate Bill Report created 11 June 2003 and revised 12
June 2003 has the same language as the Final Bill Report.
The House Bill Report, created and revised on 4
November 2003, states: "Beginning in the first month after the
Commissioner finds that the state's unemployment rate is 6.8 percent or
less, the maximum benefits payable are the lesser of twenty-six times the
weekly benefit amount or one-third of the total gross wages in the base
year. (The maximum duration of benefits is twenty-six weeks)."
These reports make it perfectly clear that the maximum duration for
benefits is twenty-six weeks.
Courts look to the bill reports to determine the legislative intent. Your
agency can do no less.
Sincerely,
JIM HONEYFORD
State Senator
15th Legislative District
cc: Juanita Myers, UI Rules Coordinator
Anthony Anton
Kathleen Collins
Tom Dooley
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"