Stephen Henigson, Regional Administrator
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Administration for Children and Families
Blanchard Plaza
2201 Sixth Ave. Rm. 610-M/S RX-70
Seattle, Washington 98121
RE: Fraudulent use of federal CFDA monies
Dear Mr. Henigson:
For the past few years, the Washington State Auditor has issued findings
against the state Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) for various
violations of state and federal law. For purposes of this complaint, we
(the Evergreen Freedom Foundation) would like to bring to your attention
several of those audit findings so your office can take the appropriate
action. Despite multiple repeat violations showing up in DSHS audits, the
state legislature has not initiated corrective action as of this writing.
It is our opinion that corrective action will need to be initiated by the
federal government.
In particular we would like to highlight Audit
Report No. 6370 (attached), Special Investigation: In-Home Child
Care Providers in Mattawa, Washington.
Issued on May 28, 2003, the report identified potential inappropriate expenditures
of an estimated $2 million in federal funds to 50 day care providers in
Mattawa, Washington. The audit found that:
DSHS had insufficient documentation to support payments to the
child care providers,
providers did not meet documentation requirements relating to
health and safety standards, and
providers gave false information on application forms.
Though the DSHS licensor responsible for issuing these licenses refused
to meet with state auditors, State Auditor Brian Sonntag was able to reach
the following conclusion:
As a result of the falsified information on application and background
inquiry forms, falsified and missing attendance records, and other missing
provider documents, we are questioning the payment of an estimated $2
million in federal funds to these 50 providers. These provider payments
were charged to federal funds in the Child Care Development Fund-Discretionary
during the time period reviewed. This condition was caused by weak or
non-existent internal controls over the application and monitoring processes.
These control weaknesses are in addition to the payment monitoring weaknesses
identified in our earlier reports.
Because of the serious nature of these issues, we sent an official
letter [attached] to the
Department's Director of Child Care and Early Learning to provide early
notification of the significant issues identified in the investigation.
We will rely on the Division of Fraud Investigations to forward evidence
in this case to the Grant County Prosecuting Attorney's Office for any
action deemed appropriate under the circumstances.
DSHS initially complied with the request to refer evidence to Grant County
law enforcement. However, according to the Grant County Sheriff, that changed
after the county successfully prosecuted an individual for illegally receiving
$241,000 in state and federal money. As of this morning, June 10, the Grant
County Sheriff indicated that DSHS is frustrating his efforts by not providing
him with all the necessary documents he has repeatedly requested. The Grant
County Prosecuting Attorney has also indicated that without this additional
evidence, his office is unable to begin additional prosecutions (stories
on this situation attached).
Though not as troubling as DSHS' refusal to cooperate with local law enforcement,
the State Auditor's report also stated:
...the Department does not perform any procedures to verify
that the correct SSN has been provided or that an applicant has supplied
his or her real name.
All providers billed the Department for services that they
could not document they provided. We estimate that $2 million in federal
Child Care Development Funds was paid to these 50 providers during the
periods reviewed. In addition, most providers have not yet corrected all
of the deficiencies cited in this report but continue to receive child
care payments from the Department.
Some in-home providers did not provide accurate and complete
information on the Criminal History and Background Information form. One
provider had a 1997 felony warrant that was not identified during the
application process. This provider is still licensed and operating as
child care provider.
This condition occurred because the Department's procedures
for criminal history and background inquiries are inadequate. The applicant
is not required to provide a SSN on the background inquiry form and this
number is not used during the review. The Department uses only the name
and address of the applicant to perform a background check. When the SSN
is available to the Department, it does not verify the validity of the
number or conduct a nation-wide background search using this information.
This condition creates a risk that the Department may not be
aware of a person who could pose a potential danger to the children placed
in the care of this provider.
In this year's Washington State Single Audit Report, the State Auditor
also made the following statements concerning this problem [from
Finding 03-20 (attached)]:
The Department has identified a significant amount of overpayments.
The overpayments, estimated at $3.2 million, consisted of approximately
25 percent provider overpayments and 75 percent client overpayments.
The Department continues to allow licensed family home child
care providers to use inadequate alternative records as support for payments
issued.
The Division has not made it a priority to implement policies
and procedures that would provide adequate support for payments made to
licensed family home providers.
In his reports, the State Auditor identified the following federal laws
and regulations as being violated by DSHS:
1. Office of Management and Budget's Circular A-133, Audits of States,
Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations, Subpart A, Section
105: (2) Where the costs, at the time of the audit, are not supported
by adequate documentation . . . .
2. Office of Management and Budget's Circular A-87, Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian Tribal Governments, Attachment A, Section
C.1 in part: Factors affecting allowability of costs. To be allowable
under Federal awards, costs must meet the following criteria: (j) Be adequately
documented.
Because the Washington State Legislature has not held DSHS accountable;
because DSHS has not corrected many of the major problems identified in
the audit; since DSHS is now frustrating local law enforcement efforts to
prosecute those violating these laws, we respectfully request that your
office initiate investigation and corrective action into these fraudulent
uses of federal monies.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Jason Mercier
Budget Research Analyst
Evergreen Freedom Foundation
cc: Mike Ambrose, Deputy Director
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
David Walker, Comptroller General
U.S. General Accounting Office
John McKay, U.S. Attorney
Western Washington District
Contact: Jason Mercier | Budget
Research Analyst | 360.956.3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"