Questions legislators
should ask about Washington's priorities
Conventional thinking says there are only two ways to balance a budget:
raise taxes or cut important services. It says budgeting is all about maintaining
the status quo. But the governor and his budget director, Marty Brown, say
there's a third approach: budgeting based on results, without raising taxes.
They called this process a Priorities of Government (POG) review.
Used properly, their new budget model would lay the foundation for responsible
state spending, not only now, but in the futureand not only here,
but in any state.
Instead of blindly struggling to maintain the state's existing budget by
adjusting for inflation and caseload increases, and cutting or taxing to
make up the difference, Locke and Brown have wiped the chalkboard clean
and started by answering four very basic questions:
1. How much money does the state have?(What is the existing
and forecasted revenue?)
2. What does the state want to accomplish? (What are the essential
services we must deliver to citizens?)
3. How will the state measure its progress in meeting those goals?
4. What is the most effective way to accomplish the state's goals with
the money available?
If a service/program is a core function, what level of government
should provide it?
How can services be provided efficiently and effectively?
How can market forces and competition be introduced into core functions,
assuring costs are controlled and quality enhanced?
After answering these questions, the governor prioritized agency activities
and purchased the most important ones within existing revenue. The result
was a balanced budget.
While the governor's model is good, he left out an important consideration:
cutting important services isn't the only way to find cost savings. Necessary
savings can also be found by providing services more efficiently and effectively
(i.e. competitive bidding) and by instituting tough performance expectations.
Over the coming weeks, we will be releasing a series of policy highlighters
encouraging legislators to ask tough questions about program delivery and
practices. It is our hope that legislators will be able to use the governor's
model to craft a responsible, balanced budget based on core governing functions.
Agency activities and priorities: (PDFs) 1(Bond Retirement
and Interest, House of Representatives, Senate, JLARC, Leg Transportation
Committee, LEAP, Office of State Actuary, Joint Legislative Systems Committee,Statute
Law Committee, Supreme Court, State Law Library, Court of Appeals, Commission
On Judicial Conduct, Office of Administrator for Courts, Office of Public
Defense, Office of the Governor, Special Approp to the Governor, Office
of Lieutenant Governor, Public Disclosure Commission, Office of the Secretary
of State, Governor's Office of Indian Affairs, Comm on Asian Pacific Amer
Affairs, Office of State Treasurer, Redistricting Commission, Office of
State Auditor, Comm on Salaries Elected Officials, Office of Attorney General,
Caseload Forecast Council, Dept of Financial Institutions)
3 (Economic
& Revenue Forecast Council, Office of Financial Management, Wash State
Health Care Authority, Office of Administrative Hearings, Department of
Personnel, State Lottery Commission, Washington State Gambling Comm, Wa
State Comm On Hispanic Affairs, Human Rights Commission, Personnel Appeals
Board, Department of Retirement Systems, State Investment Board, Public
Printer, Department of Revenue, Board of Tax Appeals, Municipal Research
Council, Off of Minority & Women's Business, Dept of General Administration,
Department of Information Services, Office of Insurance Commissioner, State
Board of Accountancy, Forensic Investigations Council)
4 (Washington
Horse Racing Commission, Board of Indust Insurance Appeals, Liquor Control
Board, Board of Pilotage Commissioners, Utilities and Transportation Comm,
Board for Volunteer Firefighters, Washington State Patrol, Wa St Criminal
Justice Train Comm, Wash Traffic Safety Commission)
5 (Department
of Labor and Industries, Department of Licensing, Military Department, Indeterminate
Sentence Review Board, Public Employment Relations Comm)
6 (Dept
of Social and Health Services, Home Care Quality Authority, Department of
Health, Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Corrections, Dept
of Services for the Blind)
7 (Sentencing
Guidelines Commission, Higher Education Coordinating Board, Supt of Public
Instruction, State School for the Blind, State School for the Deaf, Work
Force Train & Educ Coord Board, University of Washington, Washington
State University, Eastern Washington University, Central Washington University,
The Evergreen State College, Spokane Intercollege R&T Institute, Western
Washington University, Washington State Arts Commission, Washington State
Historical Society, East Wash State Historical Society, Department of Transportation)
8 (County
Road Administration Board, Transportation Improvement Board, Marine Employees'
Commission, Transportation Commission, Freight Mobility Strategic Invest,
Columbia River Gorge Commission, Department of Ecology, Wa Pollution Liab
Insurance Program, State Parks and Recreation Comm, Interagency Comm for
Outdoor Rec, Environmental Hearings Office, State Conservation Commission,
Growth Management Hearings Board)
9 (Department
of Fish and Wildlife, Department of Natural Resources, Department of Agriculture,
Employment Security Department, State Convention and Trade Center, Community/Technical
College System, Sundry Claims, Agency Loans, Contributions to Retirement
Systems)
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"