Silly performance audit bill attempts to deflect critics
by Lynn Harsh, Evergreen Freedom Foundation
It was a brilliant political move by Governor Locke and his colleagues to draft a pretend performance audit bill to hide behind for the remainder of the session. It is an extraordinary lack of courage of some in the minority party to send it happily on its way. And no doubt some lawmakers really think they did the right thing.
HB 2563 creates a new commission to oversee “independent performance audits” that will be conducted by the Office of Financial Management (OFM). What an irony! The same agency that creates the governor’s budget will also now audit it? So much for independence. I think this is commonly referred to as the fox guarding the henhouse.
As for conducting performance audits, as brilliant as the fiscal analysts might be at OFM, they are not trained to do comprehensive performance audits. Apparently this doesn’t matter since the people who wrote this bill changed the definition of performance audits to include agency self-assessments. Self-assessments have never been a legitimate performance measurement.
OFM estimates the new audit program will cost $2.5 million annually, plus the cost of an executive to run it.
Coincidentally, our independently elected state auditor does have staff trained to conduct comprehensive performance audits. Does a legitimate reason exist not to let them do their job?
Lynn Harsh is executive director for the Olympia-based Evergreen Freedom Foundation.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"