Contact: Marsha Richards, Communications
Director
(360) 956-3482
A-Plus Commission drops the ball on dropouts
By Bob Williams, President
For years, legislators have been trying unsuccessfully to get accurate high
school graduation rates. Thats why the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
recently contracted with the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation to obtain accurate
statistics.
The Gates Foundation report noted that only 67 percent of
the 9th grade students who enter our states public schools (excluding
those who transfer out of state or into a private school) graduate from
high school. In reviewing the data, our states A-Plus Commission believes
the rate is actually 70.1 percent.
This startling information caused the Commission to take action, and they
developed a 12-year plan to raise the graduation rate to 85 percent.
But the Commissions plan is not aggressive or effectively structured.
Consider:
If a school district has a graduation rate of 73 percent or more, it
is not required to take any steps to improve its graduation rate until
2013, when it must jump to 85 percent.
If a school district has a less-than 73 percent graduation rate, it
must improve its rate by one percent per year, and then hit the 85 percent
bar by 2013. If it fails to meet this requirement, it is subject to the
remedies listed in the federal No Child Left Behind Act, but faces no
state penalties.
What happens at the state level if a district fails to meet the 85 percent
goal? Nothing.
It will require 12 years to implement this new accountability
measure, which has no teeth and only gets us to an 85 percent graduation
rate. Thats another generation. Is this the best we can do?
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"