Search EFFWA Site:

EFF's Election Report ·  
Gonzales Letter ·  
Welfare Reform ·  
Boeing Contract ·  
Budget & Taxes ·  
Business Climate ·  
K-12 Fact Sheet ·  
EFF Health Study ·  
Paycheck Protection ·  
Transportation ·  
Unemployment Ins. ·  

Receive Updates ·  
Bookmark EFF ·  
Contribute ·  
EFF in the News ·  
How Can I Help? ·  
Join EFF ·  
Media Center ·  

COMMENTARY

May 5, 2003

Contact: Marsha Richards, Communications Director
(360) 956-3482

House spending proposal incomplete and unbalanced

House Democrats left town last week after passing a 2003-05 spending plan the night before the 105-day session ended. Since there was no time left to negotiate with the Senate over budget details, Governor Locke has arranged for a special session to begin May 12.

There’s only one glaring problem: the House didn’t pass a budget proposal, which means there is no legitimate legislation to negotiate. House budget-writers managed to pass an expensive spending plan, but they were not able to agree—even among themselves—on how those expenditures will be funded. Their proposal has a gaping $640 million hole due to the fact that they don’t have the votes for an expansion of Keno gambling ($38 million) or the suspension of Initiatives 728 and 732 ($603 million).

House budget leaders seem to hope senators will negotiate over the spending part of the plan and forget about the revenue part until later. This would be irresponsible, to say the least. So there is nothing to negotiate.

Having failed to pass the most important piece of legislation they would deal with this session in a timely manner, House Speaker Frank Chopp should call a private, unpaid session prior to May 12 to work out budget details so he and his colleagues can come to the table with a real plan. It would save taxpayers $16,000 to $18,000 a day.


Evergreen Freedom Foundation
P.O. Box 552, Olympia, WA 98507
Phone: (360) 956-3482, Fax: (360) 352-1874
Email: effwa@effwa.org


Election Reform


Grassroots Washington

Performance Audit Pledge
View pledge results

Health Plan 4 Life

Ten-Minute Citizen

WashingtonVotes.org

ChoosingLiberty.org

1 Part Honesty; 2 Parts Arrogance

At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:

"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"

- Rep. Jim McIntire (D - 46)
(360) 786-7886

Despite the arrogance of some state officials, Washington's constitution is clear: "All political power is inherent in the people..."

Court of Appeals Ruling AG's WEA Appeal What is the WEA Hiding? Determining Government's Core Functions Priorities of Government Stewardship Series School Directors' Handbook Professional Choices For WA Educators Congressional Testimony (6/20/02) Agency Rule Change Request Social Security Calculator Tax Dividend Calculator Public Records Requests