Contact: Marsha Richards, Communications
Director
(360) 956-3482
Chopps unreasonable demands
By Bob Williams, President
Speaker Frank Chopp and his colleagues
in the House are a stick in the spokes of responsible state budgeting. The
Senate, House Republicans, governor and taxpayers want to set priorities
and balance state spending within forecasted revenue, but they are being
held hostage by a minority demanding tax increases to reward special interest
groups.
While not unusual in politics, this is especially outrageous during a recession.
Many citizens around the state are struggling to make ends meet in the face
of reduced income and lost jobs. The Senate and governor want to pass a
no-new-taxes budget and get on with business. Democrat leaders in the House
are obstinately standing in the way.
Legislators face a legal deadline of June 1 to pass a balanced state budget.
The shrinking window is putting pressure on both sides, and House Democrats
know the last side standing wins. Will it be the side standing for taxpayers,
or the side standing for special interests? RCW
43.88.080 A budget for state government shall be finally adopted not later than
thirty calendar days prior to the beginning of the ensuing biennium.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"