Contact: Carl Gipson, Deputy
Communications Director
(360) 956-3482
Transportation relief: Will it work this time?
Governor Lockes ink is drying on the states new transportation
spending plan, but the questions remain: Will this one live up to expectations
and promises? Will the state see congestion relief at last?
That depends. Legislators and transportation officials call the plan a new
approach -- one that really, really will work this time. Lockes promise
as he signed the bills today is that the package will "improve road
safety, speed up commutes, improve freight mobility across the state, replace
four auto ferries, and improve public transportation and passenger rail."
Senate Transportation Chair Jim Horn, also present at the signing, promised
that: "With the Nickel Fund, people can be assured that
when they go to the gas pump, a full nickel will go toward identified projects
all across the state. When the bonds on these projects are paid off, that
nickel goes away."
These promises bear close watching. A careful review shows the plan suffers
the same weaknesses that prompted voters to soundly reject Referendum 51
last year. If it works, itll be a first.
Lawmakers did not include their list of transportation projects in the actual
legislation they approved, meaning the projects are not legally binding
and can be changed. Amid contentious debate and denial of this particular,
there is no ignoring the fact that as late as last week -- after the package
was approved by legislators -- DOT officials were scrambling to finalize
the project list, assign dollar amounts to each item, and reconcile numbers
that didnt jive.
And thats not all: Our children and grandchildren will be stuck paying
the bills over the next 35 years; good intentions were not enough to ensure
meaningful accountability measures; and lawmakers have been silent about
how they will address new projects that arise over the next decade.
These are serious problems.
But of course, theres a first for everything. Now is the time for
taxpayers to rise to Governor Lockes challenge to "hold us accountable."
With close citizen involvement, legislators and transportation officials
may just buck the status quo and successfully implement this plan. And they
may be persuaded to adopt a better approach in all future spending and planning.
Well accept Governor Lockes challenge to hold state officials
accountable. Excuses have run out and its time to get people and goods
moving again.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"