Open
letter to state legislators, RE: Business Climate
TO:
Washington Legislators
FROM:
Bob Williams, President
RE:
Business Climate
Dear Legislator,
Seventeen days and 76 votes will tell us if our state has what it takes
to keep Boeing and its thousands of jobs in Washington. But it's not just
about Boeing. Nearly two years of warnings from company officials alarmed
by Washington's anti-business climate can be echoed by almost any business
in our state.
Our poor business climate has resulted in the recent loss of nearly 100,000
jobs. This creates a ripple effect in public schools and the state's Basic
Health Plan. The Office of Financial Management estimates that for every
Boeing manufacturing job lost, the state will lose nearly two additional
support jobs.
Governor Locke's response has been to issue news releases and host press
conferences, but it's clear that glitzy headlines and ambitious words will
not convince Boeing (or any other company) to stick around. Those words
must be backed by immediate and decisive action.
If Scoop or Maggie were alive, they wouldn't be wandering around at Boeing
Field tomorrow hosting yet another press conference, they would be in Olympia
cracking heads together to bring about immediate solutions. Since they're
not here, we suggest the following:
Congressman Norm Dicks should step into the leadership void and hold
a closed-door meeting with representatives from Boeing's labor unions
and Rick Bender of the state Labor Council. They should work to resolve
the hostile labor environment that has led to strikes, walkouts and pickets,
and talk instead about employees sharing company profits in exchange for
labor rest.
Congressman Dicks should then meet with Governor Locke and the four
caucus leaders in the state legislature to develop a specific strategy
for resolving the critical factors contributing to Washington's anti-business
climate (click here for more details).
After the plan is developed, this team should meet with Boeing's top
executives to discuss it.
And finally, lawmakers should take advantage of the special session
to develop legislation that truly reforms unemployment insurance and workers'
compensation. Boeing's UI costs are higher in this state than anywhere
else in the world the company does business. Effective legislation would
include:
Contracting out to collect overpayments (10.9 percent of all
UI benefits are overpayments), such as Oregon and Colorado have successfully
done.
Aggressively pursuing fraud.
Offering Boeing a UI tax credit for every new job created by
the 7E7 project (up to $270 million, the amount Boeing has overpaid
on premiums).
Shortening the maximum duration for collecting UI benefits from
30 to 26 weeks, and freezing the maximum benefit at $496 per week.
We suggest the governor sign these bills into law by June 20, Boeing's
deadline for state proposals vying to host the 7E7 project.
Regardless of what happens after June 20, each and every lawmaker in our
state should have a plan for fixing the anti-business climate. While Boeing
may be the largest company pulling up stakes, it is by no means the only
one.
Currently, state officials operate from one of two philosophies when it
comes to addressing the state's economy and business climate: 1) the belief
that a growing government should redistribute wealth generated by productive
people, and 2) the belief that a competitive free market inspires innovation,
hard work and productivity.
The first philosophy got us into our current mess. The second will get
us out if lawmakers have the courage to embrace it. It only requires a few
good leaders.
If you go home after passing a budget balanced within forecasted and available
revenue, you've done well. But it's very temporary. If you leave without
taking meaningful action to save businesses in our state, you are simply
setting the clock on a time bomb that will explode in the next budget cycle.
The time for action is now, and it's up to you.
Cordially,
Bob Williams
cc:
The Honorable Norm Dicks
The Honorable Gary Locke
Bob Williams is president of the Olympia-based Evergreen Freedom Foundation.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"