Lynn Harsh | Evergreen Freedom
Foundation
In a report released yesterday, Chief School Superintendent Terry Bergeson
announced that 1,172 Washington state schools made adequate yearly progress
(AYP) under the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), while 436 failed
to achieve the standards.
Fifty of the 436 schools have been on the "failure" list for two
years or more operating under various levels of sanctions. Thirteen of the
50 schools listed as "failing" last year moved off the list this
year. This leaves 386 schools with an "On Alert" designation.
We thought it would be useful to analyze what the thirteen schools did to
get off the list and apply those lessons to the 386 schools listed as "On
Alert." But the OSPI refuses to even make, much less release, a list
identifying the 386 schools.
On Thursday morning, Bergesons staff told EFFs Bob Williams
that they would try to get the list to us in the afternoon. Today, Friday,
the OSPI made a firm statement to Bob that Bergeson was not planning to
put it together since the NCLB Act did not require her to do so, and that
if she did assemble it, she would have to release it to the public.
Yes, and thats a problem because...?
OSPI staff said if we want the information we will have to compile it ourselves
by looking at the scores from every school in the state.
O.K., well do that. But why such obstinate and unnecessary behavior
from the OSPI? Originally we were told the list would be released on Sunday,
which just happens to be in the middle of the Labor Day weekend and past
the day most papers will have written about this story.
This attitude is frustrating, but consistent with past performance where
public statements from the OSPI trumpet the need for all of us to work together
for a breakthrough, while privately they circle the bureaucracys wagons
tighter.
We are sympathetic with many of Superintendent Bergesons concerns
with the No Child Left Behind Act, but this behavior is counterproductive.
It has nothing to do with whats good for kids and everything to do
with OSPIs public relations concerns.
The No Child Left Behind Act is the law now, and if my child was attending
a school listed as "On Alert," I would want to know what problems
had been identified and how my childrens school was planning to address
them.
Note: We have been studying the No Child Left Behind Act for several
months and will release an electronic version of the first of several reports
on NCLB on September 5, 2003.
Lynn Harsh is Executive Director and Senior Education
Analyst for the Olympia-based Evergreen Freedom Foundation, a free-market
public policy research organization.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"