Revenue forecast highlights need for legislators to
begin priorities review
Jason Mercier | Evergreen
Freedom Foundation Yesterdays revenue forecast brought the state some good news:
the economy is holding steady and employment should begin to grow by the
first quarter of 2004. However, revenue is not likely to increase significantly
over the next few years, meaning legislators will again be facing budget
difficulties for the 2005-07 budget.
It currently looks as though the state will enter the
2005-07 budget with a $2-$2.5 billion deficit unless the legislature starts
taking corrective action now. Spending obligations will climb as full funding
for the teachers' cost-of-living and class-size reduction initiatives comes
due, along with the first round of collective bargaining contracts for state
employees, pension costs, health care inflation, any carry-forward costs
from the 2003-05 budget, and caseload increases.
Thankfully, Governor Locke remains committed to
pursuing spending policies that focus on priorities of government and services
most vital to Washington taxpayers.
We believe legislators should take advantage of the
governors willingness to continue a priority review of spending. They
should work with him to compel Higher Education and the Office of Superintendent
of Public Instruction (OSPI) to prioritize activities. During the governors
original priority review, Higher Education and OSPI*
refused to participate, and the governor lacks jurisdiction to force them
to comply. The legislature, however, does have the power to require cooperation.
Along with reviewing the states education priorities,
legislative policy committees should debate and vote on what they believe
to be the states core
functions for all budget areas. This will serve as a litmus test for
them to review the hundreds of agencies, boards, commissions and programs
currently funded. Legislators will then be able to ask agencies to submit
their budget requests based on delivering one or more of the states
clearly identified goals. If an agency or program is not advancing one or
more of the states core priorities, it can be eliminated.
There is no reason to wait for the next budget crisis
to hit. Now is the time for legislators to act.
* Pages 6-25
Jason Mercier is a budget research analyst for the
Evergreen Freedom Foundation.
Contact: Jason
Mercier | Budget Research Analyst | 360.956.3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"