Lynn Harsh | Evergreen Freedom
Foundation
After more than a decade of reform in our state's public schools, how would
Dr. Martin Luther King assess our progress if he were alive today?
What would he say about the 61 percent of black students in Washington
state who drop out of school before they graduate? What would he think about
the test scores of the resttest scores that, on average, border on
functional illiteracy? What would his counsel be about the future of a country
that tolerates this huge educational gap?
And how would he address the Superintendent of Public Instruction and the
majority of state lawmakers who feel our public education system is moving
the right direction? Or who feel if they just had more money, they could
close this "separate-but-equal" gap.
I think he would shake his finger at us, and in a voice quivering with
anger, would remind us that the American form of government and our way
of life dies without self-governance and an educated citizenry. I think
he would implore parents of black students to advocate loudly and persistently
for their children's educational futures. I think he would chastise the
keepers of the education status quo to put children's needs above their
own. I think he would challenge legislators to muster up courage to shake
up the status quo.
Knowledge is power and, especially in America, it must be distributed widely
across all racial and gender lines. To do less is to write our country's
epitaph.
Lynn Harsh is the Senior Education Analyst for the
Evergreen Freedom Foundation.
Contact: Marsha Richards
| Communications Director | 360.956.3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"