Oregon's tax advocates must feel a lot like Bill Murray in the movie "Groundhog
Day," with election outcomes the same one time as they were the time
before. By a margin of 59-41, Oregon voters said "no" yesterday
to Measure 30, an $800 million "temporary" income tax increase
proposal. This follows on the heels of a similar "no" vote for
Measure 28 a year before.
This creates a problem for Oregon lawmakers who have already spent the
money. Many are wailing about having no alternatives but to cut services
to the most vulnerable citizens in the state.
The argument that the sky is falling is hollow. Oregon legislators should
follow the lead of their colleagues in Iowa and elsewhere who are holding
meetings to determine government's principal objectives before
spending money. This prevents irresponsible budget cutting. As was demonstrated
in 2003 in our state, Governor Locke's Priorities of Government budget model
allowed lawmakers to come close to living within the forecasted revenue
and prioritize all state spending accordingly.
This year Washington lawmakers have another decision to make: Will they
cut spending this year to head off a projected billion dollar plus deficit
in 2005, or will they continue spending and force the next legislative body
to clean up the mess? So far legislators have been quoted as saying there's
nothing they can do this year to reduce spending, so they will keep spending
and hope the economy improves enough to get the next legislature out of
trouble. The Forecast Council recently released results indicating such
a rosy scenario is highly unlikely. Still, they persist. So much for leadership!
Our neighbors to the south, Oregon and California, got in a lot of trouble
by borrowing on an uncertain future. It seems we should be beneficiaries
of learning from their mistakes. This is a perfect time to aggressively
pursue the Priorities of Government model, not run away from it. For every
new dollar we spend, a corresponding reduction must be made to a lower budget
priority.
Murray's character in "Groundhog Day" eventually realized the
errors of his ways and reformed, waking up to a brand new day. Maybe state
tax-and-spenders will come to the same epiphany. One can only hope.
Contact: Jason
Mercier | Budget Research Analyst | 360.956.3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"