Governor Locke calls for $1 billion annually in new education
spending
Today Governor Gary Locke will announce a proposal to increase the state
sales tax by nearly 15.4% to raise an additional $1 billion per year for education
spending. The governor, using the visual power of his office, waited until
the last few days possible to introduce a proposal that has little chance of
staying alive because of the compressed legislative timetable. It is no coincidence
that at his side will be advocates of a taxpayer initiative to increase education
spending. The premise of todays announcement is that student academic
achievement will increase if we spend more money on education.
If we could significantly increase student learning by spending more money,
most of the children in our state would be highly literate by now. The legislature
and taxpayers have increased spending by up to 13% (inflation adjusted) during
this past ten years and the academic results have been very disappointing.
Besides, were spending money in the wrong places in education, so directing
more of it to the same wrong places wont help.
Currently, Washington state allocates somewhere between $8,600 and $9,400
per studentstate officials dont seem to know the exact number.
Much of that money never makes it to the classroom. Some of our lowest performing
schools in the state receive the highest per student allocations, such as T.T.Minor
in Seattle that averages more than $10,000 per child per year.
Advocates of increased spending insist they want measurable outcomes, but
they have been saying this since the early days of education reform. At the
insistence of education experts, we have spent billions recreating
academic expectations, realigning curriculum and assessments around those expectations,
training and retraining teachers, allocating money to reduce class sizes, etc.
Also at their insistence, we have refused to purge the system of poor teachers
and pay more money to good teachers. We have made schools larger and more institutionalized.
At what point do we admit that the intentions were good, but didnt pan
out.
Our current education system is bulky, cranky, inefficient and expensive.
It issues mandates and dictates policies that make no sense. It is mostly unaccountable.
For the sake of the children we purport to care so much about, why do we tolerate
this?
Our societys survival depends on a literate citizenry. It depends on
young people who are equipped to participate in and help create our countrys
economic, political and cultural future. We risk losing another generation
to educational mediocrity or worse because this governor and many lawmakers
are more willing to protect the institution of education than the students
who are warehoused within it.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"