EFF offers five-step program to address chronic audit
findings
A peek inside the Comprehensive Statewide Audit Report released today shows
sixty findings uncovering waste, fraud, abuse, mismanagement and incompetence
in state departments and agencies. Sixteen findings are repeats from last
year, meaning the problems have not been addressed.
The State Ferry System, for example, has now failed its sixteenth audit
in a row. Ah, sweet sixteen. Officials there still don't know how many passengers
ride the ferries, or where all the money collected from passengers ends
up. But perhaps the Department is on a twenty-year improvement plan.
We offer instead a simple five-step program for state officials struggling
to deal with issues of waste, fraud and mismanagement:
1. Admit you have a problem. How many audits are necessary before
state officials get serious about addressing the problems identified year
after year? Wasting taxpayer dollars is not OK.
2. Accept responsibility for your actions. In state government,
that also means being responsible for the programs under your control. For
individuals who violate the law or commit fraud, it means tangible consequences
should be enforced.
3. Set clear goals. State programs and budgets should have clear
goals and measurable outcomes. That allows legislators and agency staff
to evaluate whether or not they are meeting those goals, and to identify
solutions and areas for improvement.
4. Allow comprehensive and independent performance audits. A good
audit doesn't just follow a money trail and make a de facto report. It evaluates
the economy, efficiency and effectiveness of a program so service can be
improved. And it triggers immediate consequences for any wrongdoing or mismanagement
uncovered.
5. Reward success. Accountability isn't all about negative reinforcement.
It also acknowledges and rewards good performance. It recognizes and promotes
effective governing even as it exposes and resolves ineffective governing.
Successful agencies can then be emulated by others.
Taxpayers are not opposed to paying for the services we need. But we are
opposed to excessive taxes and wasteful spending. We have every right to
expect that the folks we hire to manage our money and services will do their
job well.
There is no disgrace in agency directors facing up to the fact that they
have a problem. What's disgraceful is refusing to do anything about it.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"