Exclusive report identifies corporate strategy for
fleecing state government Boeing ahead of the curve
When Washington Governor Gary Locke gave Boeing nearly $4 billion in incentives
to locate its 7E7 assembly in the state, did he know he was helping Boeing
provide a case study for businesses all over the country?
An "Exclusive Report" by the Carolina Journal's Paul Chesser
highlights how Ernst & Young, an international business consulting firm,
recently made a presentation to the State Government Affairs Council, detailing
how businesses can follow in Boeing's footsteps.
"Turning Your State Government Relations Department from a Money
Pit into a Cash Cow," Ernst and Young's (E&Y) PowerPoint presentation,
is an outline on how businesses can obtain government "incentives"
just like Boeing did. Among those heavy hitters that E&Y emailed this
presentation to are Nextel, Best Buy, Alcoa, Goodyear, Wal-Mart, Home Depot,
Toyota, Capital One, Bank of America, Bayer, Bellsouth, Verizon, MBNA, Microsoft,
Coors, Nissan, Anheuser-Bush, and Pfizer.
Though E&Y's report quickly acknowledges that taxpayers don't like
corporate welfare, the report offers ways to "provide government with
justification" for providing businesses state incentives. Among its
suggestions: employers should identify "public benefits" of the
projects seeking subsidies, while also making a "but for" the
incentives threat.
Not surprisingly, these are the exact strategies Boeing deftly implemented
in Washington.
And what did Washington get for its $4 billion in incentives? Not a single
net new job. Boeing is assembling the plane in Washington, but not manufacturing
most of it here. The majority of the manufacturing will be done in Japan,
Italy, Canada, Australia, Oklahoma, Texas, and Kansas. To make matters worse,
Boeing has reduced Washington employment by more than 4,200 since the incentives
passed our legislature.
Boeing even bragged to investment analysts on hand for its annual investor
conference in New York that it intends to remain profitable, in part, by
not hiring additional employees. As a Seattle
Times article points out, "Rather than make excuses for moving
work overseas, [Boeing Commercial Airplanes Chief Alan] Mulally said building
a network of global suppliers has enhanced Boeing's ability to weather the
cycles of the airplane business." Mulally went on to say," We
are not going to have the dramatic increase in employment as we have before,
because it's not what we do now."
As the Carolina Journal's exclusive points out, we should not be
surprised if we begin to see other industry executives laughing all the
way to their investors due to the folly of state government. Read the Carolina
Journal exclusive report below:
On
Milking A State's "Cash Cow" Carolina Journal | May 20, 2004
RALEIGH, NC - A workshop conducted in late March, led by experts in getting
economic development incentives from state and local governments, shows
that large companies are now banding together to learn how to extract as
much public money as possible from elected officials. The seminar, presented
during a portion of the annual three-day meeting of the State Government
Affairs Council, taught dozens of corporate government-relations executives
how to "Turn Your State Government Relations Department from a Money
Pit into a Cash Cow." Michael Press, national director of Ernst &
Young's Business Incentives Practice, and Robin Stone, former vice president
of state and local government relations for The Boeing Company, delivered
the Microsoft PowerPoint-supported presentation March 26 in Savannah, GA...more
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"