As you know, legislators recently passed a law making our state 40th in the
nation to approve charter schools. Your union, the Washington Education Association,
would like to overturn the law and cites three main concerns. Here is a brief
response to the WEA's concerns about the new public schools.
WEA says: "Instead of pouring millions of dollars into expensive
experiments like charter schools, we should invest in proven steps to improve
the quality of public schools like reducing class sizes and making sure there
is a well-qualified teacher in every classroom."
The truth: Charter schools aren't exactly "experiments"
anymore. Nearly 3,000 charter schools serve more than 650,000 students around
the country. More than half of these schools serve the neediest children, and
numerous studies have shown they're doing an excellent job providing specialized
educational opportunities.
As for the "proven steps" we're taking toward improvement in traditional
public schools:
The factors that are most important to ensure academic achievement for students
are 1) excellent teachers, 2) safe and orderly classrooms, 3) high academic
standards, 4) strong principal-leaders, 5) academic accountability, and 6)
parental involvement. These cannot be achieved if we resist change and cling
to the status quo. Flexibility and innovation in professional staff, curriculum,
academic sequencing, assessments and location are critical.
Public charter schools provide this opportunity for flexibility and innovation.
They drive more dollars to the classroom where teachers and students are doing
the hard work of education. By contrast, academic excellence is suffocated
in the highly regulated system the WEA wants to preserve.
Unfortunately, the WEA has a financial incentive to oppose charter schools.
Unlike traditional public schools, charter school teachers will not be forced
to join the union. They will have a choice. This will likely result in less
dues for the WEA, but that's no excuse for depriving children and teachers
of important academic and professional opportunities.
WEA says: "Voters have rejected charter school initiatives twice
in the last eight years. The Legislature should not have passed a law that
goes against the clearly expressed will of the people."
The truth: The fact that a new idea isn't immediately understood
is a poor reason to discard it. The first resolution calling for women's suffrage
was passed at a convention in 1848, a full 70 years before a constitutional
amendment finally made it a reality. During those years, the women's suffrage
movement was defeated time and time again, but the women leading it never gave
up because they knew what they sought was right. Good ideas will stand the
test of time and opposition.
The two previous attempts to bring charter schools to our state weren't defeated
in a vacuum. WEA officials spent hundreds of thousands of dollars taken from
mandatory teacher dues to run massive campaigns that put doubt in the minds
of teachers and fear in the minds of voters.
WEA says: "Charter schools would weaken existing public schools
by draining more than $100 million a year in funding from existing local schools."
The truth: Charter schools are public schools and they will
be funded with dollars that are already earmarked to follow students who transfer
from one public school district to another. A new charter school has the same
impact on existing public schools that a new traditional public school would
have. Moreover, because the federal government provides $450,000 in planning
grants and start-up funding for most charter schools, overall public education
spending actually increases under the new law.
Charter schools cannot receive any levy or bond money unless local school
boards agree to officially sponsor them and local voters approve.
When an existing public school converts to a charter school, the same teachers
are serving the same students in the same building. The schools are staffed
(and often managed) by certified teachers. The major changes include less bureaucratic
red tape, clearly defined goals, and more meaningful accountability.
Only the WEA could look at that situation and say with a straight face that
charter schools are "draining money" from public schools.
All that said, the most important reason to support charter schools is that
our children desperately need more high quality public school choices. The
achievement gap in our state is large and persistent. High school graduation
rates for most minority students are less than 50 percent. These facts show
that thousands of students in Washington need alternatives to the traditional
public school delivery system. A decade's worth of research shows us that public
charter schools meet the needs of many students, especially those who are hardest
to reach.
Charter schools put students first. The WEA puts itself first, teachers second,
and students third. Why not embrace these successful new schools? Good teachers
and good students have nothing to fear and everything to gain.
Regards,
Marsha Richards
Director, Education Reform Center
Evergreen Freedom Foundation
PO Box 552
Olympia, WA 98507
Phone: 360-956-3482
Fax: 360-352-1874
Email: mrichards@effwa.org
Web: www.effwa.org
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"