OSPI blames legislature, auditor, districts (anybody!)
for teacher fraud
A recent
investigation by the Evergreen Freedom Foundation (EFF) and KIRO 7 News
showed that several teachers in our state have been cheating taxpayers and
students by using fake degrees to obtain pay increases.
The Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) has decided
on a blame anybody but us response. In a recent letter to EFF,
deputy superintendent Marty Daybell wrote: OSPI relies on individual
school districts to submit valid data. . . . The State Auditors office
is charged with auditing these documents. . . . Funding was not appropriated
and therefore [an oversight system] was not created.
The state constitution clearly states that the superintendent of
public instruction shall have supervision over all matters pertaining to
public schools. (Article 3, Section 22)
OSPI should stop pointing fingers and do its job.
That said, we can think of a better way to solve the fraud problem than
the $1.3-million-dollar centralized records repository that
OSPI cant afford. We strongly urge the agency to promote a teacher
compensation model that pays teachers based on demonstrated effectiveness
in the classroom, rather than seat-time and degrees.
Students deserve excellent teachers who can demonstrate the academic value
they bring to the classroom. Excellent teachers deserve excellent pay, and
ineffective teachers should be removed from the classroom, regardless of
where they received a degree.
Adopting a flexible, performance-based teacher salary and evaluation structure
will require action from the legislature. We hope OSPI will promote this
important reform. In the meantime, OSPI can take a little more responsibility
for matters pertaining to public schools by immediately sending
a list of accredited institutions to all school districts to combat fraud
and ensure accuracy in the current system.
Contact: Marsha Richards |
Director, Education Reform Center | 360.956.3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"