EFF testimony regarding HB 1134: Creating a public
records ombudsman
Audio Link: Windows
Media | Real
Audio
(EFF testimony runs from 23:46 to 29:33 using media player)
Jason Mercier | Evergreen
Freedom Foundation
Chairwoman Haigh, committee members, good morning. My name is Jason Mercier
and I am a budget analyst for the Evergreen Freedom Foundation. I'd like
to thank Rep. Nixon for the invitation to testify today on HB
1134, creating a public
records advocate and records clearinghouse.
My duties at EFF include requesting public records, and I am also frequently
contacted by the public with questions on how to make public records requests.
These experiences and the research I have conducted on public records laws
from other states have led me to conclude that creating a public records
advocate and public records clearinghouse would ease the frustration some
governmental entities feel in responding to records requests. It would also
ease the suspicion the public sometimes justifiably holds in how their records
requests are being handled.
The people's ability to control their government is only as strong as their
access to information about their government's activities. It is because
of this premise Washington's public records law was enacted with the following
intent section:
The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies
that serve them. The people, in delegating authority, do not give their
public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know
and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining
informed so that they may maintain control over the instruments that they
have created. The public records subdivision of this chapter shall be
liberally construed and its exemptions narrowly construed to promote this
public policy - RCW
42.17.251
Despite this clear directive, many abuses to Washington's public records
law have been well documented. When even the state auditor has been denied
access by agencies to records as cited in last year's statewide accountability
report, the obstacles facing the public are only multiplied.
Frustrated with similar public records abuses occurring in his home state,
Texas' Attorney General recently hired
a prosecutor whose "only job in the Office of the Attorney General
will be to prosecute open government act violations." This new public
records prosecutor complements Texas' other public records activities which
include:
an open records division to enforce records compliance;
a committee that offers advisory opinions on public records related
legal issues; and
an open government clearinghouse that maintains a hotline to answer
the public's questions about access to public records.
Texas' public records activities have been met with great support and serve
as a model for HB 1134's provisions. Though Texas has placed these activities
in the Attorney General's office, a similar undertaking in Washington may
prove to create a conflict of interest. While Attorney General McKenna has
made creating a culture of compliance in state agencies in regards to Washington's
public records law a priority, because of the fact even the attorney general's
office has faced public records violations in the past, HB 1134's proposed
public records advocate seems better suited within the state auditor's office.
A public records advocate and clearinghouse within the state auditor's
office coupled with General McKenna's efforts to ensure agencies comply
with the state's records law could facilitate a new era of trust by the
people in government's willingness to open itself to scrutiny.
HB 1134's public records clearinghouse provisions and assistance to government
in meeting records requests requirements also provides the opportunity to
help address any potential mis-communication that may occur between records
requesters and government. By having access to an independent third party
to obtain an opinion from concerning records requests, the lack of trust
that sometimes leads to unnecessary records litigation could be mitigated.
For these reasons, the creation of a public records advocate and records
clearinghouse housed within the state auditor's office are a logical extension
of the state records law to help ensure its objective application and are
worthy of consideration.
I'd be happy to answer any question you may have.
Jason Mercier is a budget research analyst for the Evergreen Freedom
Foundation.
Contact: Jason
Mercier | Budget Analyst | 360.956.3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"