Robin Arnold-Williams, Secretary
Department of Social and Health Services
PO Box 45010
Olympia, WA 98504-5010
Dear Secretary Arnold-Williams:
Congratulations on your appointment as Secretary of the Department of Social
and Health Services (DSHS)! The glowing reports from Utah concerning your
service there give us great hope that you will be able to reform the department
and restore the people's trust in this $8-billion-a-year enterprise.
Your appointment comes at a critical juncture for DSHS, especially in light
of the department's recent lack of compliance with state and federal law
and the loss of federal funds that may result.
Based on your service record in Utah, we are hopeful you will enjoy a mutually
beneficial working relationship with State Auditor Brian Sonntag and make
compliance with state and federal law a priority of your administration.
Though Governor Gregoire has likely already briefed you on the situations
facing DSHS, the following areas are of particular concern to the citizens
of Washington:
DSHS obstructed the state auditor's audit of Washington's $6.1
billion Medicaid program, forcing the auditor to "disclaim"
the entire program. Already the Health and Human Services (HHS) department
is investigating DSHS' compliance with federal grants concerning day care
reimbursements (Mattawa day care audit finding). It is likely with the
auditor's release of the Washington Single Audit, HHS will initiate a
critical review of the state's Medicaid program. We fear these federal
funds may be at risk.
For fiscal year 2004, 41 audit findings (including the 22 findings
from the 2004 Medicaid audit) were issued against DSHS. Many of these
were repeat findings from the previous year. Among the problems identified,
DSHS:
is not in compliance with eligibility requirements for the TANF
program;
does not have adequate controls over payments made to child care
providers;
does not ensure all recovered overpayments are credited to the
proper funding source;
does not adequately perform background checks on child care providers;
paid $22 million to individuals who did not provide valid social
security numbers;
paid $1.3 million for unallowable medical services for illegal
aliens; and
cannot account for more than 1.4 million pills (worth in excess
of $529,000) at some of the state's mental institutions.
It has also recently come to light that DSHS continues to employ felons,
some convicted of murder and rape, in positions that grant those individuals
unsupervised access to the elderly, adults with disabilities and children.
We are hopeful that you will follow the advice of Tim Welch, spokesman for
the Washington Federation of State Employees, and end the practice of providing
felons with access to the vulnerable. Mr. Welch recently commented to a
state paper, "If DSHS didn't want any felons or lawbreakers to work
for DSHS, they shouldn't have hired them in the first place. I think they
need to catch these problems as people are applying for the jobs."
We agree and hope you will also conduct a retroactive house cleaning of
DSHS personnel. Families should not have to worry about whether or not they
are entrusting their loved ones to the care of an agency that grants murderers
and rapists access to our most vulnerable citizens.
While the problems facing DSHS are daunting, Governor Gregoire has expressed
confidence in your ability to move the department forward and we join her
in wishing you success. Please let me know if we can be of any assistance
as you initiate your reforms of DSHS.
Sincerely,
Bob Williams
President
Evergreen Freedom Foundation
cc: Honorable Governor Christine Gregoire
Honorable State Auditor Brian Sonntag
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"