This is the text of a gag order drafted by officials of the Washington
Education Association in an attempt to prohibit teachers and their representatives
from discussing the union's annual arbitration hearing.
1. No person representing the fee Challengers in this proceeding will disclose,
disseminate, distribute, publish, or otherwise release any documents, testimony,
portions of documents or testimony, or any other information concerning,
or in any way relating to, this Impartial Fee Determination proceeding,
Cause No. AAA 75-673-59-02, to any person, entity, organization, association,
or corporation. The terms of this paragraph shall not apply to communications
to specific individual fee Challenger(s) whom the undersigned person represents,
as of this date, in the above-referenced proceeding. The terms of this paragraph
shall, however, be binding on any fee Challenger who may receive information
concerning this proceeding from his/her representative.
2. The Association may seek to enforce this order in any Washington State
Superior Court, and the superior courts of the State of Washington shall
have the authority and jurisdiction to enforce this order through its contempt
and/or equitable powers.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"