Taxpayers spent $7,933 to educate each child in our K-12 system last year. Before asking citizens to
pony up more money, we think the Legislature needs to finds answers to a few questions.
How much of the $7,933 gets to children’s classrooms? We estimate less than $3,000 average gets directly to each child. Much of the rest of it roams around the system getting diluted and siphoned, eventually making its way to some students. Teachers say they have outdated materials, or shortages of curriculum. Librarians say they cannot update reference material. Principals say they have no money for technology. It’s no wonder!
Where is the money going that has been allocated to reduce class sizes? For the past 20 years, the legislature has been providing money to reduce the student/teacher ratio. The current allocation model funds K-3 on the basis of 18.3 students per certificated teacher. Why do teachers have up to 35 children in their classes? Where is this money? On behalf of teachers, the governor ought to find out what is happening with the money currently allocated before he pursues his class-size-reduction plan any further.
Why are only $2,812 of the $7,933 per child spent on basic education (or 35% of the total spending)?
EFF suggests: 1) the legislature mandate that nearly all the money follows the child, and 2) that school building personnel be allowed to buy the support services they need rather than losing money to the bureaucracy for the procurement of services they neither need nor want.
TABLE TEN
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES BY PROGRAM
Direct Program
Dollars
% of Total
$/Student
Basic Instruction
$2,698,440,879
44.7%
$2,812
Special Education
537,649,983
8.9%
560
Vocational/Skills Center
231,345,849
3.8%
241
Pupil Transportation
238,768,518
4.0%
249
Food Services
202,402,075
3.4%
211
Compensatory Education
$339,378,954
5.6%
354
Remediation
106,596,685
1.8%
111
Learning Assistance
62,276,834
1.0%
65
Bilingual Education
47,880,061
0.8%
50
Special and Pilot
70,794,101
1.2%
74
Institutions
863,599
0.0%
1
All Other
50,967,674
0.8%
53
Other Instruction
$163,640,687
2.7%
171
Local Ed. Prog. Enhancement
63,105,016
1.1%
66
Traffic Safety Education
15,075,550
0.3%
16
Highly Capable
11,159,873
0.2%
12
All Other
74,300,248
1.1%
77
Community Service
$30,300,492
0.5%
32
Other Support Services
$1,595,645,125
26.4%
1,662
Total Expenditures
$6,037,572,562
100.0%
$6,292
NOTES TO TABLE TEN: Table Ten presents a summarized comparison of district studentexpenditures by program. Programs of expenditures describe the categories that are directly involved in the instruction and education of students.
TABLE ELEVEN
EXPENDITURES BY FUND
Fund
Dollars
% of Total
$/Student
General
$6,037,572,5627
79.5%
$6,292
Capital Projects
939,036,241
2.1%
976
Buildings
776,564,494
10.1%
809
Equipment
83,228,262
1.1%
87
Sites
50,437,115
0.6%
53
Vehicles
26,120,817
0.3%
27
Energy
2,685,553
0.0%
1
Debt Service
539,751,358
7.1%
563
Interest
262,543,357
3.5%
274
Principal
277,208,001
3.6%
289
Associated Student Body
96,697,503
1.3%
101
Fiduciary
1,105,620
0.0%
1
Total Expenditures
$7,614,163,284
100.0%
$7,933
NOTES TO TABLE ELEVEN: Table Eleven presents a summarized total of all district funds. A fund can be described as a major self-balancing account used to carry out a specific task.
Prepared by Bob Williams, Senior Research Analyst (360) 956-3482 or effwa@effwa.org
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"