UW managers oversee employee's falsified timesheets "...common practice throughout the University"?
An internal audit conducted by the University of Washington
(UW) has uncovered a 16-year payroll scam involving multiple managers and
an employee of the Metabolism, Endocrinology and Nutrition Division (MEN)
of the school's Department of Medicine.
The audit findings, which were highlighted recently by State Auditor Brian
Sonntag, reveal that a university employee fraudulently collected $28,000
between 1985 and 2001 by falsely reporting extra hours on her timesheets.
The hours were billed to federal grants funding the school's Diabetes Endocrinology
Research Center with the full knowledge and support of managers and the
program's director. Such illegal activity in the department, notes Sonntag,
"could lead to the loss of its federal funding."
The payroll fraud began when the employee was offered a new job in 1985.
Not wanting to lose her, a manager instructed her "to record hours
not worked on the timesheet as a mechanism to compensate her the additional
salary." The false reporting continued for 16 years through the transition
of multiple managers who were informed of the arrangement. One manager even
told the employee that falsely recorded hours were a "common
practice throughout the University."
When the fraud was uncovered, UW's internal auditor made the following
recommendations (among others):
We recommend that management coordinate with Risk Management and the
Payroll Office for restitution.
We recommend that management contact the UW Police Department for
any action deemed necessary.
We recommend that management contact Human Resources for any action
deemed necessary for [the employee] and the managers responsible for falsifying
records.
The employee has since repaid the full $28,000 in fraudulent pay, but the
only punitive and preventative action taken by the university has been to
require the employee and staff involved in the payroll fraud to attend ethics
training. No criminal charges were filed.
A letter sent to the employee read in part: "While the audit found
that this was an isolated incident, and that you acted with the full knowledge
of the DERC Managers and Program Director, your participation in allowing
these improper payments was inappropriate and demonstrates poor judgement."
Other parties involved received a similar warning from the university:
We will be arranging for you to complete appropriate training in
Washington State ethics law and University policies regarding the use
of state and University resources so that you will fully understand the
relevant rules and can apply them in your work. Any future violation of
a similar nature will result in severe disciplinary action. It is our
expectation that you conduct yourself in a professional manner in order
to ensure integrity and commitment to ethical values.
Such mild measures are troubling, especially since recent investigations
show that fraudulent billing practices are not uncommon at the UW. The school
is currently facing the possibility of federal prosecution for serious Medicare
and Medicaid billing violations.
The recent corporate scandals rocking the nation are a potent reminder
of the importance of accountability. Stockholders have a right to expect
and demand integrity from the companies managing their moneyand Washington
taxpayers have a right to expect and demand integrity from the state employees
and officials managing their hard-earned tax dollars.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"