Between Boeing workers, baseball players and teachers, threatened strikes
are an epidemic. Even if teacher strikes were legal (they are not), the
timing of the union's latest demands (cost-of-living increases plus ten
percent and expanded health benefits) is poor and unprofessional.
The threatened strikes follow on the heels of an annual cost-of-living
wage increase granted by voters. They come during a recession when many
Washington citizens (taxpayers who will foot the bill for new demands) would
be happy to have a job, period. They come when the average teacher salary
is more than $3,000 more than the average salary of a private sector worker.
(Total compensation for teachers averages $57,587.) They come on the eve
of September 11, a time of national mourning. And they come, not in the
summer, but at the beginning of the school year when children will be barred
from their classrooms and it will be difficult for many families to adjust
to an interrupted schedule.
These threatened strikes against children and their parents are ironic
coming from the Washington Education Association (WEA), an organization
whose stated mission is to make public education the best it can be for
students, staff and communities. Students and communities are those
most harmed when teachers walk off the job.
That is precisely why teacher strikes are illegal in Washington state,
and union officials know it. Public employees, including teachers, do not
have the right to strike. By definition they are providing essential services.
Using those services as a bargaining chip causes unmitigated harm.
If the WEA drives teachers to strike, school districts should immediately
file a complaint with the Public Employees Relations Commission (PERC) requesting
fines and penalties.
Teacher strikes have long been considered harmful . . .
In 1958, the Washington State Supreme Court ruled that strikes by public
employees are unlawful. (Port of Seattle v. International Longshoremen's
& Warehousemen's Union, 52 Wn.2d 317, 324 P.2d 1099.) The Court
stated that while public employees have the right to organize, they do not
have the right to strike. Furthermore, the only way public employees can
gain the right to strike is if the legislature decides to give it and passes
specific legislation granting that right.
In 1967, when the legislature passed the Public Employees Collective Bargaining
Act (RCW 41.56)which excluded teachersit specifically stated
that public employees do not have the right to strike.
In 1972, the Washington State Supreme Court reaffirmed its 1958 decision.
(Rosa Irrigation District v. State, 80 Wn.2d 633, 497 P.2d 166.)
The court decision stated, "By way of compensation for the refusal
to grant this right [to strike] . . . are the provisions defining unfair
labor practices and providing remedies therefore."
In 1975, the legislature passed a law allowing teachers to bargain collectively
(RCW 41.59). Aware of the previous court decisions, the legislature did
not give teachers the right to strike. The 1975 law established the
Educational Employment Relations Act, giving step-by-step procedures for
conflict resolution. Unresolved contract issues are to be brought before
PERC before impasse.
To our knowledge, school districts seeking injunctions to stop strikes
have been successful in every case. Although we can find no instance of
the state's appellate courts addressing the legality of teacher strikes,
superior courts have ruled that teacher strikes are illegal and have issued
injunctions.
Attorney General Christine Gregoire has specifically told the WEA that
she believes Washington state law does not permit teachers to strike. In
a 1996 interview, Gregoire told the WEA, "I am opposed and I have stated
it publicly. We need to get the issue before the Supreme Court for a decision.
If called upon, I would defend otherwise. It is a tough struggle based on
[Washington] law." In other words, Gregoire told the WEA that teacher
strikes were illegal and that she would defend the school districts and
the state in any court action against striking teachers.
. . . Yet teacher strikes continue today.
So with all the legal prevention, why do we still have teacher strikes?
Under current practice, teachers suffer no penalty when they engage in
an illegal strike or work stoppage. The school year is simply extended.
School districts should have the power to seek sanctions against any illegally
striking teachers by deducting two days pay for every day a teacher is on
strike, as New York law allows. We also suggest school districts file an
unfair labor practices complaint with PERC and request a $100 per day per
member fine against both the WEA and the local education association for
any teacher strike.
Calling for teacher strikes does not make public education
the "best it can be." It is harmful, illegal and unprofessional
Prepared by Bob Williams, Senior Research Analyst. (360) 956-3482 or
effwa@effwa.org
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"