Unemployment insurance overpayments Washington overpaid $134 million in benefits in 2001
The purpose of the unemployment insurance (UI) program is
to give displaced workers a helping hand while they transition into a new
job. It assumes they will be actively seeking a new job, but the program
does not have adequate checks to hold recipients accountable.
Testifying before the U.S. Congress on unemployment fraud and abuse on
June 11, 2002, Siguard Nilsen of the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO)
made the following statement:
The health of each state's UI program depends, in part, on the ability
of the state to control its benefit payments by accurately determining
individuals' eligibility for UI benefits in a timely manner. Inaccurate
or untimely eligibility information may contribute to overpayments and
fraud. . . . At the state level, many states place a higher priority on
quickly processing and paying UI claims than on taking the necessary steps
to adequately verify claimants' initial and continued eligibility for
UI benefits.
Among the major problems leading to UI overpayments, the GAO highlighted:
Not verifying claimants' receipt of other program (workers' comp,
etc.) benefits
Failing to adequately verify claimants' identity and whether they
are legal residents
Not receiving timely information from employers
While the national overpayment rate hovers around 8%, Washington's overpayment
rate for 2001 was 10.9% (down from 16.5% in 2000). This means our state
overpaid UI claims by $134 million last year. Taking into account the $4
million in documented underpayments, our UI program handed out $130 million
more than it should have. These invalid payments are, in essence, an unfair
tax on all other employees.
Among neighboring states, only Idaho (with an overpayment rate of 15.6%)
does a worse job verifying UI benefit eligibility. With UI tax rates based
on benefits paid, Washington's overpayment means an inflated tax on businesses
and workers, who bear the burden through decreased salaries or less job
availability.
2001 Unemployment Insurance Payments
($ amounts in millions)
State
Total benefits paid
Overpayment
rate
Overpayment total
Under-payment rate
Net
Idaho
$146.45
15.6%
$22.85
$0.97
$21.88
Washington
$1,231.63
10.9%
$134.25
$4.31
$129.94
Oregon
$550.47
7.5%
$41.40
$4.79
$36.61
California
$3,392.29
5.6%
$191.33
$10.86
$180.47
Source: U.S. Dept. of Labor
Prepared Jason Mercier, Budget Research Analyst, (360) 956-3482 or jmercier@effwa.org
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"