Search EFFWA Site:

EFF's Election Report ·  
Gonzales Letter ·  
Welfare Reform ·  
Boeing Contract ·  
Budget & Taxes ·  
Business Climate ·  
K-12 Fact Sheet ·  
EFF Health Study ·  
Paycheck Protection ·  
Transportation ·  
Unemployment Ins. ·  

Receive Updates ·  
Bookmark EFF ·  
Contribute ·  
EFF in the News ·  
How Can I Help? ·  
Join EFF ·  
Media Center ·  

POLICY HIGHLIGHTER
Volume 12, Number 22
December 4, 2002

Unemployment insurance overpayments
Washington overpaid $134 million in benefits in 2001

The purpose of the unemployment insurance (UI) program is to give displaced workers a helping hand while they transition into a new job. It assumes they will be actively seeking a new job, but the program does not have adequate checks to hold recipients accountable.

Testifying before the U.S. Congress on unemployment fraud and abuse on June 11, 2002, Siguard Nilsen of the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) made the following statement:

The health of each state's UI program depends, in part, on the ability of the state to control its benefit payments by accurately determining individuals' eligibility for UI benefits in a timely manner. Inaccurate or untimely eligibility information may contribute to overpayments and fraud. . . . At the state level, many states place a higher priority on quickly processing and paying UI claims than on taking the necessary steps to adequately verify claimants' initial and continued eligibility for UI benefits.

Among the major problems leading to UI overpayments, the GAO highlighted:

• Not verifying claimants' receipt of other program (workers' comp, etc.) benefits

• Failing to adequately verify claimants' identity and whether they are legal residents

• Not receiving timely information from employers

While the national overpayment rate hovers around 8%, Washington's overpayment rate for 2001 was 10.9% (down from 16.5% in 2000). This means our state overpaid UI claims by $134 million last year. Taking into account the $4 million in documented underpayments, our UI program handed out $130 million more than it should have. These invalid payments are, in essence, an unfair tax on all other employees.

Among neighboring states, only Idaho (with an overpayment rate of 15.6%) does a worse job verifying UI benefit eligibility. With UI tax rates based on benefits paid, Washington's overpayment means an inflated tax on businesses and workers, who bear the burden through decreased salaries or less job availability.

2001 Unemployment Insurance Payments
($ amounts in millions)

State Total benefits paid Overpayment
rate
Overpayment total Under-payment rate Net

Idaho

$146.45 15.6% $22.85 $0.97 $21.88
Washington $1,231.63 10.9% $134.25 $4.31 $129.94

Oregon $550.47 7.5% $41.40 $4.79 $36.61

California

$3,392.29 5.6% $191.33 $10.86 $180.47

Source: U.S. Dept. of Labor

Prepared Jason Mercier, Budget Research Analyst, (360) 956-3482 or jmercier@effwa.org


Evergreen Freedom Foundation
P.O. Box 552, Olympia, WA 98507
Phone: (360) 956-3482, Fax: (360) 352-1874
Email: effwa@effwa.org


Election Reform


Grassroots Washington

Performance Audit Pledge
View pledge results

Health Plan 4 Life

Ten-Minute Citizen

WashingtonVotes.org

ChoosingLiberty.org

1 Part Honesty; 2 Parts Arrogance

At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:

"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"

- Rep. Jim McIntire (D - 46)
(360) 786-7886

Despite the arrogance of some state officials, Washington's constitution is clear: "All political power is inherent in the people..."

Court of Appeals Ruling AG's WEA Appeal What is the WEA Hiding? Determining Government's Core Functions Priorities of Government Stewardship Series School Directors' Handbook Professional Choices For WA Educators Congressional Testimony (6/20/02) Agency Rule Change Request Social Security Calculator Tax Dividend Calculator Public Records Requests