As Congress prepares to re-authorize its historic 1996 welfare
reform law, it is time to reflect on Washington's progress. Since 1993,
the United States Department of Health and Human Services has kept its eye
on the status of states helping people out of the welfare system and into
sustainable employment. Where does Washington rank?
Percentage of the population on welfare
Following are statistics showing how Washington ranks among its neighbors:
State
Welfare Recipients
Population
% of Population
Idaho
2,223
1,293,953
0.17
Oregon
45,752
3,429,293
1.33
Washington
137,371
5,894,121
2.33
California
1,163,839
34,501,130
3.37
Source: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human
Services as of September 2001
Welfare recipients
From January 1993 through September 2001, the national welfare caseload
reduction was 62 percent. Washington's reduction rate was 48 percent, while
most other western states had higher reduction rates. During that time,
only nine fell below Washington in reducing welfare caseloads, including
Hawaii and Alaska.
Number of Welfare Recipients
State
January 1993
September 2001
% Reduction
U.S.
14,115,000
5,343,212
-62%
Idaho
19,812
2,223
-89%
Oregon
117,656
45,752
-61%
Washington
263,792
137,371
-48%
California
2,415,121
1,163,839
-52%
Source: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human
Services as of September 2001.
During the economic boom times between 1993 and 2001, if Washington
had matched Idaho's rate of caseload reduction, 107,772 fewer people would
be on welfare in our state. If our state had met Oregon's rate of reduction,
Washington would have had 34,792 fewer welfare caseloads in September 2001.
Conclusion
As President Bush seeks to enhance the current welfare laws by adding work
requirements for benefit receipt, Washington officials must strive to improve
the state's caseload reductions as well. Since Washington's 48 percent caseload
reduction is far below the U.S. average of 62 percent, lawmakers should
establish comprehensive goals for continued decreases the rest of this decade.
While it is true Washington is still in a recession and the state is facing
high unemployment, the vast majority of the positions eliminated or lost
were high wage jobs. Generally, individuals leaving welfare enter the workforce
in low to medium wage positions to gain skills and confidence (service jobs).
Those jobs are more readily available. While it may be more difficult to
reduce caseloads during hard economic times, we owe it to taxpayers, benefit
recipients and their children to provide the opportunities necessary to
pursue the American dream. All parties will benefit as more of our state's
citizens become self-sufficient.
Prepared by Hans Zeiger, Research Assistant
Contact: Jason Mercier, Budget Research Analyst, (360) 956-3482 or jmercier@effwa.org
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"