Search EFFWA Site:

EFF's Election Report ·  
Gonzales Letter ·  
Welfare Reform ·  
Boeing Contract ·  
Budget & Taxes ·  
Business Climate ·  
K-12 Fact Sheet ·  
EFF Health Study ·  
Paycheck Protection ·  
Transportation ·  
Unemployment Ins. ·  

Receive Updates ·  
Bookmark EFF ·  
Contribute ·  
EFF in the News ·  
How Can I Help? ·  
Join EFF ·  
Media Center ·  

POLICY HIGHLIGHTER
Volume 12, Number 9
June 25, 2002

Welfare Reform
Where does Washington rank?

As Congress prepares to re-authorize its historic 1996 welfare reform law, it is time to reflect on Washington's progress. Since 1993, the United States Department of Health and Human Services has kept its eye on the status of states helping people out of the welfare system and into sustainable employment. Where does Washington rank?

Percentage of the population on welfare
Following are statistics showing how Washington ranks among its neighbors:

State
Welfare Recipients
Population
% of Population
Idaho
2,223
1,293,953
0.17
Oregon
45,752
3,429,293
1.33
Washington
137,371
5,894,121
2.33
California
1,163,839
34,501,130
3.37

Source: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services as of September 2001

Welfare recipients
From January 1993 through September 2001, the national welfare caseload reduction was 62 percent. Washington's reduction rate was 48 percent, while most other western states had higher reduction rates. During that time, only nine fell below Washington in reducing welfare caseloads, including Hawaii and Alaska.

Number of Welfare Recipients

State
January 1993
September 2001
% Reduction
U.S.
14,115,000
5,343,212
-62%
Idaho
19,812
2,223
-89%
Oregon
117,656
45,752
-61%
Washington
263,792
137,371
-48%
California
2,415,121
1,163,839
-52%

Source: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services as of September 2001.

During the economic boom times between 1993 and 2001, if Washington had matched Idaho's rate of caseload reduction, 107,772 fewer people would be on welfare in our state. If our state had met Oregon's rate of reduction, Washington would have had 34,792 fewer welfare caseloads in September 2001.

Conclusion
As President Bush seeks to enhance the current welfare laws by adding work requirements for benefit receipt, Washington officials must strive to improve the state's caseload reductions as well. Since Washington's 48 percent caseload reduction is far below the U.S. average of 62 percent, lawmakers should establish comprehensive goals for continued decreases the rest of this decade.

While it is true Washington is still in a recession and the state is facing high unemployment, the vast majority of the positions eliminated or lost were high wage jobs. Generally, individuals leaving welfare enter the workforce in low to medium wage positions to gain skills and confidence (service jobs). Those jobs are more readily available. While it may be more difficult to reduce caseloads during hard economic times, we owe it to taxpayers, benefit recipients and their children to provide the opportunities necessary to pursue the American dream. All parties will benefit as more of our state's citizens become self-sufficient.

Prepared by Hans Zeiger, Research Assistant
Contact: Jason Mercier, Budget Research Analyst, (360) 956-3482 or jmercier@effwa.org


Evergreen Freedom Foundation
P.O. Box 552, Olympia, WA 98507
Phone: (360) 956-3482, Fax: (360) 352-1874
Email: effwa@effwa.org


Election Reform


Grassroots Washington

Performance Audit Pledge
View pledge results

Health Plan 4 Life

Ten-Minute Citizen

WashingtonVotes.org

ChoosingLiberty.org

1 Part Honesty; 2 Parts Arrogance

At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:

"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"

- Rep. Jim McIntire (D - 46)
(360) 786-7886

Despite the arrogance of some state officials, Washington's constitution is clear: "All political power is inherent in the people..."

Court of Appeals Ruling AG's WEA Appeal What is the WEA Hiding? Determining Government's Core Functions Priorities of Government Stewardship Series School Directors' Handbook Professional Choices For WA Educators Congressional Testimony (6/20/02) Agency Rule Change Request Social Security Calculator Tax Dividend Calculator Public Records Requests