Washington taxpayers spend billions of dollars every year to provide
medical assistance for needy individuals and families. But not all the recipients
are truly needy or qualified for the assistance. Much of the money is going
to illegal aliens and families and individuals who earn up to 250 percent
of the federal poverty income level.
To ensure taxpayer dollars actually reach the folks who need them, lawmakers
should consider the following recommendations.
1. Require documentation of income.
Before enrolling in a state-subsidized health care program, applicants should
be required to verify their income level. Currently, the state does not
require documentation of income eligibility for participants in maternity
or children's programs. In addition, once a child is enrolled in a program,
he or she can continue receiving assistance for twelve months regardless
of changes in the family income. According to estimates by the Senate Ways
and Means Committee, requiring proof of eligibility for these programs would
save the state $35 million each budget cycle.
2. Reduce eligibility levels.
The State Children's Health Insurance Plan (SCHIP) currently provides health
coverage to about 12,000 children (up to age 19) who live in households
with income between 200 and 250 percent of the federal poverty level. At
this level, a child in a family of three with a household income of $3,100
per month is eligible for the program.
Ten other states offer coverage to families earning more than twice the
poverty level. Our neighbors do not. Oregon offers SCHIP and Medicaid coverage
to families earning 170 percent of poverty. Idaho and Montana offer coverage
at 150 percent of poverty. A plan being considered in the state senate this
year would reduce Washington's eligible income level to 175 percent of the
poverty level. Under these standards, a family of four could earn up to
$32,000 a year and still receive assistance, and the state would save $95
million each budget cycle.
3. Stop providing prenatal coverage to illegal residents.
At a time when benefits are being reduced for legal Washington citizens
the state should not be using taxpayer dollars to provide medical benefits
to illegal residents.
Eleven states, including Washington, currently provide prenatal coverage
to illegal aliens. Our neighborsOregon, Idaho and Montanado
not provide this coverage. Governor Locke's 2003-2005 proposed budget estimates
that 6,800 pregnant women who are living in the state illegally and earning
up to $2,300 a month will be eligible for prenatal benefits. This will cost
taxpayers $47 million over two years.
Talk abounds of needing to cut medical assistance programs to make up for
the state's budget shortfall. Lawmakers need to carefully review the state's
medical assistance program to ensure efficient management of programs, verification
of eligibility, and meaningful qualification standards so dollars and services
reach state citizens who truly need them.
Prepared by Bob Williams, President
and Senior Research Analyst (360) 956-3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"