A careful review of Governor Locke's proposed 2003-05 budget reveals
that the state deficit has been dramatically overstated. Washington's staggering
$2.4 billion deficit becomes a $900 million problem at current spending
levels, and it seems most of the "devastating cuts" creating an
uproar around the state are actually taken from spending increases that
do not yet exist. We have identified three important facts omitted from
most public discussion of the budget:
1. State revenue is forecasted to INCREASE by $1.6 billion (7.4 percent)
in 2003-05.
2003-05 estimated revenue: $22,689.7 million
2001-03 estimated revenue: $21,126.2 million Increase: $1,563.5 million
2. Despite talk of massive cuts, Governor Locke's proposed 2003-05 budget
INCREASES state spending by $528 million.
2003-05 estimated expenditures: $22,979.4 million
2001-03 estimated expenditures: $22,451.4 million Increase $528.0 million
3. Nearly one third of the governor's purported $2.4 billion "cuts"
in the coming budget cycle are not cuts at all. They simply delay, reduce
or eliminate plans for increased spending and expanded programs. Consider
the governor's "cuts":
$389 million that would have expanded the Basic
Health Plan.
$351 million infuture raises for state employees
and vendors.
$229 million infuture cost-of-living raises for
teachers.
$221 million in new allocations for class size reduction.
$140 million in general funds plannedto offset higher
college tuition.*
$111 million in forecasted higher costs for health
benefits.*
$83 million reduction in pension collections due
to new calculations.
*Health care and higher education costs are increasing, but both systems
suffer significant waste and mismanagement problems. Hundreds of millions
could be saved by implementing meaningful accountability standards.
Thus, it appears that $1.524 billion of Locke's $2.4 billion in "cuts"
is not comprised of actual cuts. It is simply a decrease in
hoped-for increases. Making "cuts" in these areas
does not affect existing programs or existing funding levels.
Legislators could reduce the state's actual deficit to $655 million if
they froze funds for class size reduction in the first year ($221 million)
of the coming budget cycle, rather than just the second year. In addition,
if Governor Locke would implement his new Priorities of Government budget
model now instead of increasing spending by $235 million in
this budget cycle with his supplemental budget, he could reduce the deficit
(and the need for real cuts) to $420 million.
Prepared by Bob Williams, President
and Senior Research Analyst (360) 956-3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"