Crack down on fraud and overpayments before raising
unemployment insurance taxes
Washingtons Employment Security Department (ESD), which oversees
the states unemployment insurance (UI) system, recently notified
businesses that UI tax rates will increase by an average of 14 percent next
year. ESD claims the rate hike is necessary because the states UI
trust fund shrank 24 percent in the last year due to the high number of
laid-off workers collecting benefits.
State law requires that UI rates be increased if the trust fund drops below
a certain balance. As of September 30, the balance was approximately $216
million below what is necessary to remain at current tax rates. The 14 percent
increase means employers will pay an average of $600 per employee into the
UI system in 2004up from $527 in 2003.
That said, the increase could have been avoided. In 2002, more than 12
percent of the UI benefits disbursed by the state were overpayments,
meaning recipients were not eligible to receive the money. All told, Washington
businesses paid almost $200 million more than necessary. Had these ineligible
payments not been made, the UI trust would only be around $16 million below
the thresholdan amount that could very well be made up with improved
efficiency measures and recipient verification, or at the very least a much
smaller rate increase.
Before raising UI rates, ESD has a responsibility to thoroughly verify
claimant eligibility, aggressively pursue overpayments, and prosecute fraud.
Now is the time for the Department to implement the new reforms passed by
the legislature this year, and lawmakers should revisit Governor Lockes
veto of the requirement
that all UI claimants provide proof of identity.
While businesses write the checks for the UI program, workers ultimately
shoulder the cost through lower salaries, less benefits and lost jobs.
Unemployment Insurance Overpayments
($ amounts in millions)
State
Change in overpayment rate 2001-02
2002 overpayment rate
2002 overpayment total
2002 under-payment total
2002 net loss
Idaho
<0.43%>
15.18%
$27.44
$0.20
$27.24
Washington
1.34%
12.24%
$207.24
$7.62
$199.62
California
1.61%
7.25%
$395.23
$40.34
$354.89
Oregon
<1.76%>
5.74%
$45.53
$4.12
$41.41
US Average
0.91%
9.10%
$73.56
$5.34
$68.22
Source: U.S. Dept. of Labor
Prepared by Jason Mercier | Budget
Research Analyst | 360.956.3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"