Search EFFWA Site:

EFF's Election Report ·  
Gonzales Letter ·  
Welfare Reform ·  
Boeing Contract ·  
Budget & Taxes ·  
Business Climate ·  
K-12 Fact Sheet ·  
EFF Health Study ·  
Paycheck Protection ·  
Transportation ·  
Unemployment Ins. ·  

Receive Updates ·  
Bookmark EFF ·  
Contribute ·  
EFF in the News ·  
How Can I Help? ·  
Join EFF ·  
Media Center ·  

POLICY HIGHLIGHTER

Volume 13, Number 33
December 12, 2003

Six-year budget outlook: $3.1 billion deficit or $380 million surplus?

Depending on how legislators approach budgeting over the next six years—beginning with next year’s supplemental budget—Washington will face a potential $3.1 billion deficit in 2009, or enjoy a $380 million surplus. The prediction comes from a six-year budget forecast presented last Friday by the Senate Ways and Means committee.

The forecast notes that state revenues are expected to continue increasing. Assuming legislators adhere to I-601 spending limits and follow the principles outlined in Governor Locke’s new priority-based budget model, revenues will exceed expenditures by $380 million in 2009. (The estimate allows for continued funding of I-728 and the state’s proposed tax incentives for Boeing and the hi-tech industry.)

This means legislators must begin the budget process by defining the results they want, then decide which programs and services to purchase with available revenue to best achieve those results. This ensures a balanced budget.

On the other hand, if lawmakers begin budgeting with the assumption that they must continue funding all current programs, adjusting for caseload increases, they will have a massive deficit.

Legislators will face their first test next session when they develop a supplemental budget. The Ways and Means committee is projecting additional spending needs of $197 million. The trick will be to prioritize spending and offset increases in one area with decreases in another, maintaining a revenue-neutral budget and preserving the state’s emergency reserves. This will require reviewing all state programs and activities to determine how effectively they are meeting the state’s highest priorities. The questions legislators must answer are:

  1. How much money does the state have?
  2. What does the state want to accomplish?
  3. What is the most effective way to accomplish the state’s goals with the money available?
  4. How will the state measure its progress in meeting those goals?

It is also important to note that despite the progress made this year with priority-based budgeting, the state is still planning to spend $149 million more than it expects to collect this budget cycle. This shortfall should not be patched with one-time reserves.

Developing the supplemental budget will provide legislators with an opportunity to show they can stay committed to results. Their choices will determine whether Washingtonians face deficits and tax increases or enjoy budget discipline and surpluses.

Six-year forecast
(Dollars in millions)
Numbers updated by Senate Ways and Means 12/10/03

2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
“Baseline” expenditures
$11,270
$11,700
$12,037
$12,369
$12,725
$13,099
“Baseline” revenues
$11,170
$11,626
$12,207
$12,818
$13,458
$14,131
Select policy
add-ons
$75
$150
$513
$770
$1,198
$1,538
Total expenditures
$11,345
$11,850
$12,550
$13,139
$13,923
$14,637
Total revenues*
$11,759
$11,990
$12,100
$12,049
$11,891
$11,571
Ending balance
$414
$140
<$450>
<$1,090>
<$2,032>
<$3,066

*Assumes continued funding of I-728, Boeing and Hi-tech tax incentives, reserves and any carry-forward deficits.

2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
I-601 spending limit
$11,345
$11,850
$12,160
$12,489
$12,839
$13,223
Revenues*
$11,347
$11,576
$11,960
$12,499
$12,980
$13,603
Revenues over 601 limit
 $2
<$274>
<$200>
$10
$141
$380

*Assumes continued funding of I-728, Boeing and Hi-tech tax incentives, and excludes reserves or carry-forward deficits from overspending I-601 limit.

Prepared by Jason Mercier | Budget Research Analyst

Contact: Jason Mercier | Budget Researsh Analyst | 360.956.3482


Evergreen Freedom Foundation
P.O. Box 552, Olympia, WA 98507
Phone: (360) 956-3482, Fax: (360) 352-1874
Email: effwa@effwa.org


Election Reform


Grassroots Washington

Performance Audit Pledge
View pledge results

Health Plan 4 Life

Ten-Minute Citizen

WashingtonVotes.org

ChoosingLiberty.org

1 Part Honesty; 2 Parts Arrogance

At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:

"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"

- Rep. Jim McIntire (D - 46)
(360) 786-7886

Despite the arrogance of some state officials, Washington's constitution is clear: "All political power is inherent in the people..."

Court of Appeals Ruling AG's WEA Appeal What is the WEA Hiding? Determining Government's Core Functions Priorities of Government Stewardship Series School Directors' Handbook Professional Choices For WA Educators Congressional Testimony (6/20/02) Agency Rule Change Request Social Security Calculator Tax Dividend Calculator Public Records Requests