When audits fall short Weak audits will damage voter trust
Not everything that goes by the name performance audit deserves
the title. No matter what legislation is called, if it does not provide
for true accountability it will do more to damage voter trust than improve
it.
HB 1053 (general performance audits) and SHB 1121 (transportation-related
performance audits) are two reactions to the resounding failure of Referendum
51 and its obvious message from taxpayers: no more taxes without accountability.
Unfortunately, neither measure meets independent auditing standards.
We agree with the state auditor that the critical elements of a successful
performance audit are independence, employee participation, citizen and
private sector involvement, publicly reported results, and effective evaluation
of a programs worth to citizens. Furthermore, an effective audit cannot
be completed unless state agencies have clear goals based on clear mission
statements.
A good audit does not just follow a money trail and make a de facto report.
It evaluates the economy, efficiency and effectiveness of a program so service
can be improved. It triggers immediate consequences for any wrongdoing or
mismanagement uncovered, and it acknowledges and rewards good performance.
Under such a system, the state auditor would also be responsible for reporting
on best practices so they could be replicated in other state agencies. Legislative
committees would hold hearings to make sure agencies corrected identified
weaknesses.
Instead, the new measures approved by legislators would leave control of
the audits in the hands of a legislative committee or a citizen board appointed
by state officials. This amounts to allowing the folks being audited to
determine the criteria for the audit.
The weaknesses in this approach are obvious, even in its initial stages.
Representative Deb Wallace, sponsor of the transportation-related audit
bill, is also an employee of the Department of Transportation. No
audits have been completed yet, but as someone on the inside
who can see some changes that need to be made, Rep. Wallace is clear in
advance what her approach will be: I would say [DOT is] actually efficient.
I would say that, absolutely.
Across the country, true, comprehensive performance audits have resulted
in savings and more efficient and effective delivery of services. In Texas,
successful performance audits have allowed the state to save $9 billion
over the last ten years.
Legislators in Washington can find savings for taxpayers as well if they
implement independent, comprehensive performance audits.
Prepared by Bob Williams, President
and Senior Research Analyst (360) 956-3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"