The demand is loud and insistent: "More money for education!"
It's become popular to publish studies calling for higher education spending,
and voters will likely see a billion-dollar education tax initiative on
November's ballot. The state teachers' union is even preparing to sue the
legislature for more money. But do we really need to spend more money, or
simply make better choices about what we buy with the dollars we already
have?
While education spending in our state has risen steadily (at nearly three
times the rate of inflation) for the past decade, overall student performance
has fallen. Is it possible "more money" is not education's magic
elixir? Is it possible the problems evident in schools today are the result
of a system that is itself broken and outdated?
We shouldn't be afraid to take a hard look at the facts and answer these
questions. We owe that to the children relying on our public schools for
the opportunity to become independent and productive adults, and to the
hard-working taxpayers sacrificing to provide that opportunity.
Here are some simple facts about education spending and performance from
the most recent data available, which covers the 2002-03 school year.
1. Basic facts. 2,212 schools and 296 school districts in Washington
state serve a student enrollment of 1,015,968. The state employs 59,810
certified teachers, 3,910 certified non-teaching staff (librarians, counselors,
etc.), and 36,158 "other" full-time-equivalent (FTE) staff. This
gives us a student/teacher ratio of 17 to one. The total FTE staff count
is 99,878, providing a student/FTE staff ratio of 10.2 to one. And the total
number of people working in the K-12 system (head count, including full-time
and part-time) is 150,815, giving us a total student/all staff ratio of
6.7 to one.
2. Total spending. Washington spent $9,195,419,356 (all funds) on
education in 2002-03. The state's general fund education spending increased
almost three times faster than inflation over the last decade (1993-95 to
2003-05), up 31.9% in real dollars and 13.1% in inflation-adjusted dollars.
3. Teacher Salaries. Teachers in our state are paid primarily based
on how long they've had their job, not on how well they do it. Unfortunately,
the state's rigid salary structure (a gift from the teachers' union) means
some excellent teachers are paid less than they're worth, while some poor
teachers (who probably shouldn't be in the classroom at all) are paid more.
The average teacher salary in Washington state is $45,265. Factoring
in benefits and supplemental contracts puts the average total compensation
at $61,620.
4. Spending per pupil. Figuring out how much Washington spends per
pupil each year in K-12 schools is like trying to pick up a wet bar of soap.
The numbers are elusive. The most recent data from OSPI say the state spends
$9,454 per pupil. The most recent estimates from the National Education
Association put the figure as high as $10,127. Even erring on the low side,
are we ready to say we can't provide most children with a quality education
for $9,454 a year?
5. Use of dollars. Less than half (42.5 percent) of the dollars
spent on education are used for what the Superintendent of Public Instruction
defines as "basic instruction". Are we certain the billions of
dollars being used for other purposes are buying more value for students
than would basic instruction in their classrooms?
6. Class sizes. Hundreds of studies have shown class size is not
the most important factor in student achievement. Rather, it should be considered
in context with the elements that do matter most: 1) strong leader-principals,
2) well-qualified teachers, 3) safe and orderly classrooms, 4) high academic
standards, and 5) meaningful parental involvement. The legislature currently
allocates money for a student/teacher ratio of 18.8 to one. Most teachers
can tell you their class sizes are much larger than 18 or 19 students. Where
does the money go when it reaches the district level?
7. Test scores. The percentages of students failing to score
as "proficient" on the reading, writing and math portions of the
Washington Assessment of Student Learning are alarming.
Students failing to pass WASL, 2002-03 Source: Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction
4th Grade
7th Grade
10th Grade
Reading
33.3%
52.1%
40.0%
Writing
46.4%
45.3%
39.5%
Math
44.8%
63.2%
60.6%
8. High school graduation rates. Depending on which numbers you
look at, only 56 to 68 percent of the students who enter 9th grade in our
state graduate from high school. At best, that means one in three never
make it. Among minority students the dropout rates are even worse, with
two out of three African-American students failing to graduate.
9. Students unprepared for college. Of the students who do graduate
and move on to community college in our state, more than half must
take remedial courses in reading, writing and math to prepare them for college-level
work.
As the facts show, more money does not necessarily mean higher academic
achievement. Instead of focusing on input (more money, more teachers), we
should focus on output (student achievement, results). Discussions about
money are only meaningful when we know what we must buy to best help students
learn.
Sources: 1) Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI);
2) SPI; 3) Legislative Evaluation and Accountability Program (LEAP); 4)
OSPI and National Education Association; 5) OSPI; 6) House Appropriations
Committee; 7) OSPI; 8) OSPI and Manhattan Institute; 9) OSPI.
Prepared by: Marsha Richards
| Education Reform Director | 360-956-3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"