Search EFFWA Site:

EFF's Election Report ·  
Gonzales Letter ·  
Welfare Reform ·  
Boeing Contract ·  
Budget & Taxes ·  
Business Climate ·  
K-12 Fact Sheet ·  
EFF Health Study ·  
Paycheck Protection ·  
Transportation ·  
Unemployment Ins. ·  

Receive Updates ·  
Bookmark EFF ·  
Contribute ·  
EFF in the News ·  
How Can I Help? ·  
Join EFF ·  
Media Center ·  

POLICY HIGHLIGHTER

Volume 14, Number 18
August 5, 2004

State’s per-pupil education spending is up
Contrary to claims, per-pupil spending outpaces inflation

No matter how you slice the pie chart, education spending in Washington is up. This runs contrary to claims made by sponsors of Initiative 884 (the billion-dollar education tax increase) that per-pupil spending has fallen behind inflation. In fact, per-pupil spending has increased at nearly double the rate of inflation since 1994.

In real dollars, per-pupil spending from the state’s general fund increased by 30.4% between 1994 and 2003, from $5,701.63 to $7,436.15. Adjusted for inflation, this is a 12.7% spending increase.


Click image to enlarge chart.

A more accurate look at per-pupil education spending includes all sources of school funding, not just the general fund. Factoring in local property tax levies, federal grants, capital (construction) funds, transportation funds, and other public school expenditures, the state’s per-pupil spending has increased by 34.8% since 1994, from $7,000.99 to $9,438.14 in 2003. This is an inflation-adjusted increase of 16.5%.



Click image to enlarge chart.

In calculating a lower per-pupil spending rate based on inflation, the League of Education Voters (sponsor of I-884) uses the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which is limited to the high-cost Seattle/Tacoma/Bremerton area. State budget writers base their calculations on a more standard inflation measure called the Implicit Price Deflator (IPD), which is also used by the U.S. Department of Commerce and the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

According to the state’s Office of Financial Management: “The IPD is used for determining inflation for state budgeting purposes because it is considered more representative of the general mix of goods and services purchased by the state than other indicators available. The other primary inflation index, the Consumer Price Index (CPI), may not adequately allow for the effects of technology and quality changes.”

While the state’s education spending is hitting record highs, school performance and student achievement are down. The problem must be addressed, but simply pouring more dollars into our public schools will not help.

State Education Spending, 1994 – 2003

Year Total Spending Enrollment State $
per-pupil
All $ per-pupil All $
per-pupil
(Inflation adjusted)
1994-1995 $6,295,317,236 899,203 $5,701.63 $7,000.99 $7,000.99
1995-1996 $6,677,300,788 917,652 $5,845.46 $7,276.50 $7,166.21
1996-1997 $6,912,444,608 936,395 $5,953.46 $7,381.98 $7,309.03
1997-1998 $7,341,428,319 949,349 $6,168.95 $7,733.12 $7,461.06
1998-1999 $7,612,163,284 959,541 $6,292.15 $7,933.13 $7,547.07
1999-2000 $7,947,426,562 961,449 $6,586.36 $8,266.09 $7,633.88
2000-2001 $8,337,327,852 964,037 $6,945.36 $8,648.35 $7,807.20
2001-2002 $8,700,470,520 969,838 $7,224.85 $8,971.05 $7,988.83
2002-2003 $9,179,901,852 972,639 $7,436.15 $9,438.14 $8,103.65

Source: Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Prepared by: Hans Zeiger and Marsha Richards | 360-956-3482


Evergreen Freedom Foundation
P.O. Box 552, Olympia, WA 98507
Phone: (360) 956-3482, Fax: (360) 352-1874
Email: effwa@effwa.org


Election Reform


Grassroots Washington

Performance Audit Pledge
View pledge results

Health Plan 4 Life

Ten-Minute Citizen

WashingtonVotes.org

ChoosingLiberty.org

1 Part Honesty; 2 Parts Arrogance

At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:

"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"

- Rep. Jim McIntire (D - 46)
(360) 786-7886

Despite the arrogance of some state officials, Washington's constitution is clear: "All political power is inherent in the people..."

Court of Appeals Ruling AG's WEA Appeal What is the WEA Hiding? Determining Government's Core Functions Priorities of Government Stewardship Series School Directors' Handbook Professional Choices For WA Educators Congressional Testimony (6/20/02) Agency Rule Change Request Social Security Calculator Tax Dividend Calculator Public Records Requests