Washington still tops Northwest in state and
local tax burden
Despite a commendable drop in Washington's state and local tax burden,
state taxpayers are still lifting the heaviest tax burden in the Northwest.
According to a recent Department of Revenue (DOR) report, Washington's state
and local tax burden has dropped to levels not seen since the 1980's.
While progress has been made due mainly to citizen tax-reduction initiatives,
Washington currently ranks higher than its neighbors in Idaho and Oregon
in terms of state and local tax burden.
State and Local Tax Collections Per $1,000 Personal Income
(1998-2002)
Washingtonians pay the highest gas tax burden in the Northwest and third
highest nationally (approximately seven cents more per gallon than the national
average). This is due to last year's legislative approval of a five-cent
increase in Washington's previous gas tax of 23 cents per gallon.
State gasoline taxes (Rates effective as of July 2004)
Washington's overall tax burden is exacerbated by the fact state taxpayers
are not allowed to deduct the state sales taxes from their federal income
taxes. Taxpayers in most other states are able to deduct state income taxes
from their federal tax burden. As a result, Washingtonians face a proportionally
higher combined state, local, and federal tax burden.
When comparing state and local tax burden it makes sense to look at Washington's
ranking against other states without an income tax. In this comparison,
Washington's tax burden ranks fourth highest out of nine states without
an income tax.
State and Local Tax Collections Per $1,000 Personal Income
(1998-2002)
States with no income tax
As the above numbers show, even if Congress eliminates the discriminatory
tax treatment of states without an income tax, Washington still has room
to improve its overall state and local tax burden.
Washington's current level of state taxes is forecasted to result in an
increase of nearly $1.7 billion in state revenue
available for the 2005-07 budget over revenue available for the current
budget biennium (2003-05). Despite this 7.2 percent increase in revenue,
desired spending by state policy makers is expected to result in a projected
budget "deficit" of nearly $1.1 billion. To reach this level of
deficit spending, however, lawmakers will have to eliminate the taxpayers'
state spending limit protection (I-601) enacted by voters in 1993. If this
occurs, progress made in reducing Washington's state and local tax burden
will be lost which may result in another taxpayer's revolt.
Prepared by: Jason Mercier |
Budget Research Analyst | 360-956-3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"