Washington's continued fiscal mismanagement and inadequate audit oversight
has resulted in a doubling of the state's Employee Dishonesty
Blanket Bond insurance premium and a 400 percent increase
in the deductible for fiscal year 2004-05. The Office of Financial Management
(OFM) has identified Washington's numerous audit findings as the culprit
for this insurance premium increase.
In a letter sent to state agencies regarding Washington's Employee Dishonesty
Blanket Bond, OFM wrote:
In compliance with RCW
43.17.100, the referenced commercial insurance policy has been renewed.
This policy provides coverage for loss sustained by the state of Washington
through any fraudulent or dishonest act(s) committed by any of its employees.
This year's renewal has been extremely difficult. Although Great American
has provided the state fidelity coverage for a number of years, their
quote for the 2004-2005 policy term was unacceptable. The state's insurance
broker approached the insurance market, but because of the state's
claims history and the number of audit findings relating to inadequate
internal controls, it was not easy to find carriers willing to provide
coverage. We were able to obtain coverage but at a cost. Premium has doubled
and the deductible has increased from $100,000 to $500,000.
OFM also sent the following email to one state agency regarding the difficulty
in obtaining continued fraud-loss insurance coverage: "Our broker is
in the process of renewing the state's fidelity bond for 2004-05. Because
of our claims activity and findings by the Auditor's Office we are having
a difficult time getting quotes. One carrier is looking hopeful but before
they will give us a quote they need more information."
The current trend for yearly audit findings indicates the difficulty in
obtaining this insurance next year may only increase. Consider that in 2001,
the state auditor issued 13
audit findings. That number grew to 24
by 2002. Last year, the number of audit findings reached an astounding 60.
The 2004 audit findings are due to be released before the end of this year.
While it is encouraging that some legislative hearings were held last month
regarding a few of the 2003 audit findings (Labor and Industries and Department
of Social and Health Services audits), the legislature must exert
more oversight and ultimately require compliance with audit findings.
Many of the 2003 audit findings were repeats from the year before. According
to state law, the instance of a repeat audit finding should never occur
(Please see EFF PH 14-10).
Since the state auditor does not have the ability to enforce compliance
and cause corrective action for audit findings, the responsibility for ongoing
fiscal mismanagement and increases in the state's fraud-loss insurance premium
falls equally on Washington's executive and legislative branches. Until
agencies face meaningful consequences for audit violations, taxpayers will
continue to suffer the pain of both the initial agency wrongdoing as well
as being forced to have more of their hard-earned tax-dollars earmarked
to ever increasing state insurance premiums.
Prepared by: Jason Mercier |
Budget Research Analyst | 360-956-3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"