Illegitimate "degrees" being used
by some teachers to obtain higher pay
Earlier this year multiple stories surfaced in the national media exposing
the problem of federal government employees obtaining "fake" degrees
to acquire salary increases. These "degrees" were claimed by employees
at the Department of Homeland Security, the Pentagon, the Transportation
Security Administration, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Department
of Treasury and the Department of Education. Illegitimate degrees also surfaced
in a number of state reviews of teacher personnel files.
In 2002, three Oregon teachers had their credentials revoked after claiming
to hold degrees from La Salle University in Louisiana, a now-defunct diploma
mill (there is an accredited La Salle in Pennsylvania). In 2003, the state
of Georgia audited its 130,000 teachers and found 11 had received salary
increases based on "degrees" from Saint Regis University, a diploma
mill in Liberia, Africa. In July those teachers were permanently barred
from teaching in Georgia. Similar investigations have been launched in Texas,
California and Hawaii, as well as abroad in the United Kingdom, Australia
and India.
Using an illegitimate degree to obtain a job or promotion is only illegal
in North Dakota, Nevada, Indiana, New Jersey, Illinois and Oregon, where
the crime is a misdemeanor punishable by job revocation and/or fines ranging
from $350 to $2,500.
What is a diploma mill?
The Oregon
Office of Degree Authorization states: "Diploma mills (or degree
mills) are substandard or fraudulent colleges' that offer potential
students degrees with little or no serious work. Some are simple frauds:
a mailbox to which people send money in exchange for paper that purports
to be a college degree. Others require some nominal work from the student
but do not require college-level course work that is normally required for
a degree."
Regarding the problem with diploma mills, Alan Contreras, Administrator
of Oregon's Office of Degree Authorization recently said: "We as a
society treat the idea of a college degree as though it means something.
If everybody's got a Ph.D., then where are you? We all run around calling
each other doctor. But the effect on society is profoundly negative."
These concerns prompted the Evergreen Freedom Foundation (EFF) to launch
a survey of the state's school districts to determine if any teachers had
used illegitimate degrees to obtain salary increases. EFF sought to verify
that all Washington teachers purporting to hold advanced degrees actually
received them from legitimate, accredited institutions of higher learning.
In the United States, accredited institutions can be checked through a comprehensive
institutional database compiled by the Council
for Higher Education Accreditation.
The Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) includes
as a minimum prerequisite to hold a teaching certificate in Washington "a
bachelor's degree from a regionally accredited college/university."
A phone inquiry to OSPI also revealed that the same requirement applies
to an advanced degree: such a degree must come from a regionally accredited
college/university (foreign transcripts are evaluated to determine US-equivalency).
Of Washington's 296 school districts, only 65 provided the information
we requested. An additional 25 districts refused to provide assistance.
Most districts did not respond at all.
Of the 65 school districts that provided information, four districts were
found to have a total of six teachers claiming illegitimate degrees.
District
Unaccredited Institution
Location
#
Remarks
Bremerton
La Salle University
LA
1
Defunct diploma mill
Olympia
Berne University
St. Kitts
1 (PhD)
Unaccredited
Wilbur
Alameda College and University
La Salle University
FL, ID
LA
1
2 (PhD)
Diploma mill
Defunct diploma mill
Zillah
California Coast University
CA
1
Unaccredited
This data is troubling when one considers that, of the 22 percent of school
districts that provided information, there are at least six degrees from
"institutions" unaccredited for use in qualifying for higher salaries
based on degrees obtained. This begs the question: How many more unaccredited
degrees have been claimed in the remaining 78 percent of Washington's school
districts?
The State Auditor's Office issued a finding earlier this year against the
Pateros
School District for not verifying the degrees reported by teachers.
The auditor determined that at least one Pateros teacher received $35,365
in "unearned salary and benefits" as a result of claiming an unaccredited
university degree.
Recommendations
1) Washington should follow the lead of states that have made it illegal
to obtain a job or profit from the use of illegitimate degrees.
2) Until changes are made to the current teacher salary model, OSPI should
perform a statewide audit of all school districts to confirm that all claimed
teacher degrees come from legitimate, accredited institutions of higher
learning.
3) Instead of basing teacher pay primarily on job seniority and degrees
earned, legislators should adopt a flexible salary model that allows educators
to earn competitive pay for demonstrable excellence and for teaching in
high-demand subject areas. Earlier this year the Democratic Leadership Council
recommended
a similar policy.
Conclusion
The state's current salary system, which pays teachers based on how long
they've held their job and how many degrees they can show on paper, is bad
for students and provides incentives for fraud. The state should instead
pay teachers based on their effectiveness in the classroom and their ability
to demonstrate student achievement.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"