Volume 14, Number 27
November 19, 2004
Updated January 28, 2005
Time for performance review of state's K-12
education system
Some people seem to believe that education spending must arbitrarily
increase each year regardless of whether or not current expenditures are
resulting in necessary student achievement or efficient operations. This
precept runs counter to a Priorities of Government (POG) review. If the
results of the 2004 election are any indication, voters seem to agree.
When asked to raise their taxes by more than a billion dollars per year
to support increased education spending, sixty percent of Washington voters
said "no" by rejecting Initiative 884 (I-884). Some claim I-884
failed not because it was an unnecessary tax increase, but because it was
the wrong kind of tax increase. Now that voters have rejected a sales tax
increase, these education tax advocates are talking about the need for an
income tax.
This tax approach assumes that the current $9.2
billion (all funds) spent each year on K-12 education in Washington
(more than $9,400 per student) is insufficient. It is difficult to support
this belief, however, since no one knows with any certainty if current education
expenditures are efficient and economic.
Before seeking increased education spending, state officials should focus
their efforts on determining how the state is spending existing taxpayer
dollars.
Former Governor Gary Locke's POG budget consultant, Peter Hutchinson, recently
said the following when asked if POG was a good fit for local school districts:
"We do a lot of good things in our schools. If we can't afford them
all, we need to be sure that we keep the ones that make the most differenceadd
the most to ensuring that all children learn at least a year's worth every
year. Finding the answers requires that we be disciplinedbase our
decisions on what works, not on what we hope will work."
Virginia's Democrat Governor, Mark Warner, recently came to the conclusion
that his state needed to find out what did and didn't work concerning its
education spending; he announced his desire to conduct a statewide performance
review of Virginia's K-12 schools to "give parents, policymakers, and
all taxpayers a clear picture of how their schools are performing."
Governor Warner justified his intention, saying: "At a time when we
are sending historic levels of new state support to our public schools,
it is vitally important to demonstrate that local schools are doing their
part to achieve maximum efficiency. We are not making any statement about
how our schools are run now. Instead, these efficiency reviews recognize
what any good business executive already knows: even the best-run enterprise
can undergo continuous improvement and operate in a more cost-effective
way."
Virginia has since completed performance reviews of four school districts
resulting in identified savings of $4.3 millionmore than $1 million
in savings for each district reviewed. These reviews are now being expanded
to other districts in the state. Virginia's performance reviews are modeled
after the nearly 100 successful performance audits of schools conducted
in Texas since 1991, which have resulted in identified savings of $750 million.
Article
9, Section 1 of Washington's Constitution states: "It is the paramount
duty of the state to make ample provision for the education of all children
residing within its borders, without distinction or preference on account
of race, color, caste, or sex." Washington's Constitution does not
say it is the paramount duty of the state to arbitrarily increase education
spending each year. If Washingtonians do not know how effectively and efficiently
money is currently being spent, how can we make a judgement as to whether
or not ample provision has been made?
Before trying to find an "acceptable tax" to increase or implement
in order to spend even more money on K-12 education, state officials should
learn from the experiences of Virginia and Texas and embrace performance
reviews of Washington's schools. Such reviews will further enable legislators
and local school boards to accurately review and rank the state's K-12 priorities
when crafting future budgets. Once Washington's school districts undergo
these needed performance reviews, then, and only then, will taxpayers know
if and where more resources are needed.
Prepared by: Jason Mercier |
Budget Researsh Analyst | 360.956.3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"