The National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO)
recently released its 2003
State Expenditure Report, which compares how states rank in regard
to various budget expenditure levels. Founded in 1945, NASBO is the "principal
organization for the professional development of its members; for improving
the capabilities of staff and information available to state budget officers;
and for the development of the national fiscal and executive management
policies of the National Governors Association . . . NASBO is composed of
the heads of state finance departments, the states' chief budget officers,
and their deputies."
Because various special interest groups often lament the level of expenditures
for their causes by pointing to Washington's commitment to various programs
in comparison to other states, it is useful to utilize a consistent source
to compare states' rankings. The NASBO 2003 State Expenditure Report
serves as a reliable source for comparing state spending because of
its consistent methodology.
The NASBO report highlighted several state expenditures, including K-12
education, higher education, public assistance, Medicaid, and corrections.
Below is a regional state comparison of these expenditures. Data for 2002
and 2003 are actuals while 2004 figures represent estimates. All tables
are derived from NASBO's 2003 State Expenditure Report.
K-12 expenditures as a percent of total expenditures
(all funds)
State
2002
2003
2004
Oregon
18.7
15.1
16.9
California
22.3
24.0
22.7
Washington
22.9
23.6
23.5
Idaho
26.8
26.6
24.4
U.S. Average
21.3
21.7
21.5
* Washington's general fund state K-12 expenditures percentage:
44%
Higher education expenditures as a percent of total expenditures (all
funds)
State
2002
2003
2004
Idaho
9.4
8.6
9.2
California
11.5
10.8
10.8
Oregon
10.5
12.2
11.2
Washington
16.1
17.0
16.0
U.S. Average
10.9
10.8
10.5
* Washington's general fund state higher education expenditures
percentage: 12%
Public assistance expenditures as a percent of total expenditures (all
funds)
State
2002
2003
2004
Idaho
0.3
0.3
0.3
Oregon
0.8
0.9
0.7
Washington
4.8
4.4
4.0
California
6.4
6.2
5.9
U.S. Average
2.3
2.2
2.1
* Washington's general fund state public assistance expenditures
percentage: 4%
Medicaid expenditures as a percent of total expenditures (all funds)
State
2002
2003
2004
Oregon
17.3
18.7
13.7
California
19.3
18.5
17.6
Idaho
17.9
19.6
18.9
Washington
22.1
22.2
22.2
U.S. Average
20.7
21.4
21.9
* Washington's general fund state Medicaid expenditures
percentage: 24% (25% in 2004)
Corrections expenditures as a percent of total expenditures
(all funds)
State
2002
2003
2004
Washington
2.9
3.0
2.9
Oregon
4.7
5.5
3.2
California
3.7
3.4
3.5
Idaho
4.2
4.0
3.8
U.S. Average
3.6
3.5
3.4
* Washington's general fund state corrections expenditures
percentage: 6 % (5% in 2002)
Washington exceeds the U.S. average for percentage of total expenditures
in K-12 education, higher education, public assistance and Medicaid. Of
the five areas chosen for review, only in corrections expenditures does
Washington rank below the U.S. average and its neighbors. To view a complete
copy of NASBO's 2003 State Expenditure Report, please visit: http://www.nasbo.org/Publications/PDFs/2003ExpendReport.pdf
Prepared by: Jason
Mercier | Budget Research Analyst | 360.956.3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"