Search EFFWA Site:

EFF's Election Report ·  
Gonzales Letter ·  
Welfare Reform ·  
Boeing Contract ·  
Budget & Taxes ·  
Business Climate ·  
K-12 Fact Sheet ·  
EFF Health Study ·  
Paycheck Protection ·  
Transportation ·  
Unemployment Ins. ·  

Receive Updates ·  
Bookmark EFF ·  
Contribute ·  
EFF in the News ·  
How Can I Help? ·  
Join EFF ·  
Media Center ·  

POLICY HIGHLIGHTER

Volume 14, Number 31
December 13, 2004

State budget expenditures comparison

The National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO) recently released its 2003 State Expenditure Report, which compares how states rank in regard to various budget expenditure levels. Founded in 1945, NASBO is the "principal organization for the professional development of its members; for improving the capabilities of staff and information available to state budget officers; and for the development of the national fiscal and executive management policies of the National Governors Association . . . NASBO is composed of the heads of state finance departments, the states' chief budget officers, and their deputies."

Because various special interest groups often lament the level of expenditures for their causes by pointing to Washington's commitment to various programs in comparison to other states, it is useful to utilize a consistent source to compare states' rankings. The NASBO 2003 State Expenditure Report serves as a reliable source for comparing state spending because of its consistent methodology.

The NASBO report highlighted several state expenditures, including K-12 education, higher education, public assistance, Medicaid, and corrections. Below is a regional state comparison of these expenditures. Data for 2002 and 2003 are actuals while 2004 figures represent estimates. All tables are derived from NASBO's 2003 State Expenditure Report.

K-12 expenditures as a percent of total expenditures (all funds)

State 2002 2003 2004
Oregon 18.7 15.1 16.9
California 22.3 24.0 22.7
Washington 22.9 23.6 23.5
Idaho 26.8 26.6 24.4
U.S. Average 21.3 21.7 21.5

* Washington's general fund state K-12 expenditures percentage: 44%


Higher education expenditures as a percent of total expenditures (all funds)

State 2002 2003 2004
Idaho 9.4 8.6 9.2
California 11.5 10.8 10.8
Oregon 10.5 12.2 11.2
Washington 16.1 17.0 16.0
U.S. Average 10.9 10.8 10.5

* Washington's general fund state higher education expenditures percentage: 12%


Public assistance expenditures as a percent of total expenditures (all funds)

State 2002 2003 2004
Idaho 0.3 0.3 0.3
Oregon 0.8 0.9 0.7
Washington 4.8 4.4 4.0
California 6.4 6.2 5.9
U.S. Average 2.3 2.2 2.1

* Washington's general fund state public assistance expenditures percentage: 4%


Medicaid expenditures as a percent of total expenditures (all funds)

State 2002 2003 2004
Oregon 17.3 18.7 13.7
California 19.3 18.5 17.6
Idaho 17.9 19.6 18.9
Washington 22.1 22.2 22.2
U.S. Average 20.7 21.4 21.9

* Washington's general fund state Medicaid expenditures percentage: 24% (25% in 2004)

Corrections expenditures as a percent of total expenditures (all funds)

State 2002 2003 2004
Washington 2.9 3.0 2.9
Oregon 4.7 5.5 3.2
California 3.7 3.4 3.5
Idaho 4.2 4.0 3.8
U.S. Average 3.6 3.5 3.4

* Washington's general fund state corrections expenditures percentage: 6 % (5% in 2002)

Washington exceeds the U.S. average for percentage of total expenditures in K-12 education, higher education, public assistance and Medicaid. Of the five areas chosen for review, only in corrections expenditures does Washington rank below the U.S. average and its neighbors. To view a complete copy of NASBO's 2003 State Expenditure Report, please visit: http://www.nasbo.org/Publications/PDFs/2003ExpendReport.pdf

Prepared by: Jason Mercier | Budget Research Analyst | 360.956.3482


Evergreen Freedom Foundation
P.O. Box 552, Olympia, WA 98507
Phone: (360) 956-3482, Fax: (360) 352-1874
Email: effwa@effwa.org


Election Reform


Grassroots Washington

Performance Audit Pledge
View pledge results

Health Plan 4 Life

Ten-Minute Citizen

WashingtonVotes.org

ChoosingLiberty.org

1 Part Honesty; 2 Parts Arrogance

At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:

"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"

- Rep. Jim McIntire (D - 46)
(360) 786-7886

Despite the arrogance of some state officials, Washington's constitution is clear: "All political power is inherent in the people..."

Court of Appeals Ruling AG's WEA Appeal What is the WEA Hiding? Determining Government's Core Functions Priorities of Government Stewardship Series School Directors' Handbook Professional Choices For WA Educators Congressional Testimony (6/20/02) Agency Rule Change Request Social Security Calculator Tax Dividend Calculator Public Records Requests