Out-going Governor Gary Locke is proposing a $598 million tax increase
to fund his $26.2 billion 2005-07 budget request. Locke's budget represents
a $2.9 billion spending increase over the current budget,
including a requested $161 million 2005 supplemental budget. This is a 12.5
percent increase in spending. Forecasted revenue for the next budget
is expected to increase by 1.5 billion (6.7 percent), while the implicit
price deflator inflation index is expected to be up 3.7 percent. This means
Locke hopes to increase state spending by more than three times the rate
of inflation and $1.4 billion higher than forecasted revenue (prior to his
nearly $600 million tax increase taking effect).
In January, the Evergreen Freedom Foundation will release recommended budget
savings based on a review of core functions of government. In the meantime,
it is interesting to see which agencies win and lose under Locke's tax-and-spend
$2.9 billion spending increase budget request. Below is a
select review of how certain agencies fare under Locke's proposal, which
assumes passage of a 2005 supplemental budget.
Losers: real reductions in current expenditures (general fund state)
Agency/Office
Funding change over 2003-05
Percentage change
State Auditor
<$16 thousand>
<1.1 %>
Winners: increases over current expenditures (general fund state)
Agency/Office
Funding change over 2003-05
Percentage change
Social and Health Services
$1.2 billion
18.4 %
Superintendent of Public Instruction
$736.5 million
7.2 %
Corrections
$160 million
12.8 %
Community Colleges
$149.8 million
14.5 %
Higher Education Coordinating Board
$82.3 million
25.3 %
University of Washington
$59.2 million
9.3 %
Washington State University
$54.1 million
14.4 %
Washington State Patrol
$33.8 million
86 %
Labor and Industries
$27.3 million
225.1 %
Western Washington University
$17.3 million
15.7 %
Central Washington University
$17.1 million
20.8 %
Eastern Washington University
$16.2 million
19.5 %
Ecology
$11.5 million
15.9 %
Health
$11.3 million
9.5 %
Parks and Recreation
$11 million
18.2 %
Fish and Wildlife
$10.3 million
12.4 %
Evergreen State College
$6.9 million
14.8 %
Veterans Affairs
$5.8 million
26.5 %
Financial Management
$4.7 million
18.1 %
Attorney General
$2.5 million
29.4 %
Governor
$2.4 million
30.9 %
Agriculture
$1.5 million
8 %
Licensing
$1.2 million
11.8 %
Indian Affairs
$228 thousand
48 %
Liquor Control Board
$215 thousand
7.3 %
Asian Affairs
$207 thousand
52.7 %
African-American Affairs
$202 thousand
50.2 %
Hispanic Affairs
$198 thousand
47.9%
Interagency Outdoor Recreation Committee
$190 thousand
7.2 %
Arts Commission
$150 thousand
3.3 %
Lt. Governor
$141 thousand
12.7 %
Salary Commission
$36 thousand
11.7 %
The question for legislators at this time: Will an electorate
that just rejected a billion dollar a year tax increase for education programs
support a $600 million tax increase to fund the type of spending increases
Locke proposes?
Prepared by: Jason
Mercier | Budget Research Analyst | 360.956.3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"