Governor Christine Gregoire has chosen not to proceed with former Governor
Locke's widely acclaimed priorities of government (POG) budget model. Instead
Gregoire drafted a $25.8 billion budget for 2005-07 that sets up serious
fiscal problems for the 2007-09 budget, and which she herself calls "unsustainable."
Forecasted revenue for the 2005-07 budget is projected to be $1.7 billion
higher than the current biennium. But Gregoire's 2005-07 budget proposal
increases spending by $2.6 billion (including her requested 2005 $219 million
"emergency" supplemental budget). This increase is more than three-times
the expected rate of inflation.
Expenditures
(All dollars in millions)
2003-05 (current)
$23,246
2005-07
$25,824
Difference
$2,578 (11 percent)
Governor's Priorities
Gregoire increases funding for public schools by 6.4 percent, higher education
by 11.8 percent, the Department of Social and Health Services by 17.9 percent
and the Department of Corrections by 8 percent. Additionally, Gregoire's
budget:
Increases funding for the Office of Minority and Women's
Business by 53 percent and FTE employees by six percent;
Increases funding for the Horse Racing Commission by 82
percent;
Increases funding for the Commission on Asian-American
Affairs by 50 percent and FTE employees by 67 percent;
Increases funding for the Commission on Hispanic Affairs
by 46 percent and FTE employees by 67 percent;
Increases funding for the Commission on African-American
Affairs by 48 percent and FTE employees by 67 percent; but
Decreases funding for the State Auditor's office by 4.2
percent and includes no funding for performance audits; and
Defers $524 million in payments to the state's pension
system.
The governor also decided not to provide a vendor rate increase to doctors
who serve Medicaid patients. At the same time, the governor increases the
state's expenses by $33 million by not reviewing client eligibility every
six months, a cost-saving measure approved in the last budget.
Tax Increases
The governor's budget also includes a proposed $203 million tax increase
earmarked to fund Initiatives 728 and 732. This directly
conflicts with promises made to voters in 2000 when these measures were
approved. At that time, voters were told the initiatives would not require
a tax increase or harm the state's budget. When asked last year in I-884
to raise taxes to fund the provisions of I-728 and I-732, voters rejected
it by a 2-1 margin.
Even with the $203 million tax increase, Gregoire's projected 2005-07 ending
fund balance results in a reserve fund of less than one percent of her total
expenditures. This means, should we have another earthquake or any other
unforeseen emergency, the state will be ill-equipped to respond.
Ignoring Intent of Voter-Approved Spending Limit
To reach the $25.8 billion record level of spending, Gregoire exploits a
loophole in the I-601 voter-approved spending limit. The loophole allows
for increasing the spending limit by making fund transfers from dedicated
accounts to the general fund. Additional budget expenditures (such as a
supplemental budget) also increase the spending limit.
By requesting a $219 million 2005 supplemental budget and making $244 million
in fund transfers in her 2005-07 budget proposal, Gregoire greatly expands
the voter-approved I-601 spending limit from $25.1 billion to $25.9 billion
($810 million increase). With only three months remaining in fiscal year
2005, the governor is claiming that the $219 million in expenditures she
is requesting are emergencies that can't wait until the next budget (July
1, 2005). However, the governor hopes to transfer $45 million from the general
fund to the Health Services Account in her supplemental budget. She then
plans to transfer $86 million from the Health Services Account to the general
fund for her 2005-07 budget. This budget slight of hand enables her to artificially
increase the I-601 spending limit.
Under the law, if taxes or expenditures in excess of the I-601 spending
limit are proposed, a vote of the people is required to approve the increase.
By increasing the I-601 spending limit by $810 millionthe governor
is denying the people their right under the law to vote on her tax and expenditures
increases.
I-601 spending limit
(All dollars in millions)
2005-07 (current)
$25,107
2005-07 (Gregoire)
$25,917
Difference
$810
Governor Gregoire has repeatedly stated that "we must
change the culture of state government." It is clear from the governor's
$203 million in tax increases, $244 million in fund shifts, and $524 million
in pension deferments, she is not committed to the POG budget process and
fighting for a "sustainable" budget. The governor is instead repeating
the same budget mistakes of the past. By falling into the past traps of
using one-time revenue and other "unsustainable" budget gimmicks,
Governor Gregoire is demonstrating that she is unable to exercise the budget
leadership needed this session to resolve the state's spending "structural
budget problem."
Prepared by: Bob Williams (President) & Jason
Mercier (Budget Research Analyst) | 360.956.3482
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"