The Washington State Labor Council (WSLC), state affiliate of the AFL-CIO,
released a position paper last year decrying the consequences of contracting
government services to the private sector.(1) Citing
the potential for "corruption and cronyism" and reduced public
accountability, the Council stated it "will oppose efforts to contract
out government services."(2)
That is, unless the WSLC is the recipient of those contracts.
As a taxpayer watchdog, EFF monitors state contract performance, and we
discovered the WSLC holds several contracts for government services. In
the Council's own case, the fears of its officials are justified: It looks
like they do benefit from cronyism and reduced public accountability.
A look at some of the Council's contracts also sheds light on the militant
opposition to unemployment insurance reforms mounted by Rick Bender and
other labor leaders recently. The WSLC is benefitting from taxpayer-funded
efforts to expand unemployment benefits for workers.
Here's a peek at two of the Council's contracts:
1. Employment Security Department (ESD)
Taxpayers will pay the WSLC $771,995 this year to act as an advisor for
the state's "Rapid Response" program, which provides transitional
services for unemployed workers.(3)
In its advisory role, the WSLC works with the department to identify the
demands of labor unions across the state. The Council's two full-time "labor
liaisons" intervene to encourage the rehire of laid-off employees,
promote union goals for job promotion, monitor potential closures and layoffs,
and publicize union and government services for unemployed workers.(4)
Detailed activity logs filed by Rapid Response liaisons thus far include:
Workshops to encourage unemployed workers to file for state unemployment
benefits.(5)
Sessions to encourage a state meat packing plant to hire "almost
80 limited-English-speaking workers."(6)
Petitions filed with the U.S. Department of Labor calling for an
investigation of Kaiser Aluminum for relying too heavily on imported materials,
which the union blames for Tacoma and Spokane layoffs.(7)
Much of the time and cost billed to taxpayers for Rapid Response, aside
from the salaries of labor liaisons, is spent on a variety of union activities,
networking and travel. Expenses thus far include:
A June 2002 trip for WSLC officials to the AFL-CIO convention
in Oregon.(8)
$400 in expenses for one labor liaison to attend Governor Locke's
Economic Development Conference in Spokane.(9)
Salary and costs for a liaison to conduct a workshop at the WSLC
Convention that would be a "benefit to the movement and system"
by teaching "case law theories that may be of use in runaway corporation
situations."(10)
Labor liaisons attended the AFL-CIO's Working for America Institute
Convention in Philadelphia.(11) (Registration, miscellaneous
bills, three nights lodging at the Wyndham Hotel.)
Labor liaisons attended a union conference in Scottsdale, AZ.(12)
2. Department of Labor and Industries (L&I)
The WSLC holds a $354,301 contract with L&I for a workers' compensation
program called "Project Help."(13) The goals
of Project Help are: 1) to expedite claims resolution, 2) to ensure that
all rights are preserved and protected, 3) to reduce unnecessary litigation,
and 4) to provide information and assistance free of charge.(14)
Interestingly, all of these services are already provided by two separate
L&I claims assistance offices.(15) This has prompted
some, like former Governor Mike Lowry, to seek an end to Project Help.(16)
In 1996, L&I was asked to conduct an internal audit of the program to
determine its effectiveness.(17) The audit revealed
that of an average 11,102 inquiries each month, only eight percent were
handled by Project Help.(18) The rest were taken care
of by the two L&I offices. The audit concluded that "the cost of
Project Help providing this service is higher than the cost of either [state
office] providing claims assistance."(19)
In addition, the audit identified numerous Project Help activities "not
associated with a specific contract deliverable.(20)
These included:
Participation in the Seattle Chapter of Women in Workers' Compensation.(21)
Coordination of activities for Worker Memorial Day, which includes
planning and coordinating several union-sponsored events that celebrate
the lives of deceased workers.(22)
Annual WSLC Workers' Compensation Conference, which covers the
broad theme: "Learning How the System Works." In 1996, L&I
concluded: "There is no contract deliverable that pertains specifically
to organizing and planning this conference."(23)
Five-day WSLC convention.(24)
Expense-paid trips to labor conferences around nation, with funding
including registration, meals, travel, membership dues, and regular salary
during the events. The audit's conclusion: "The direct benefits [of
conference participation] to the Department are not clear."(25)
Project Help recently began to focus its services on illegal immigrants.
In a presentation earlier this year in Yakima, representatives of the Mexican
Consulate were trained to obtain workers' compensation from the state, and
they have requested that Project Help conduct bi-monthly sessions with a
Spanish interpreter for farm workers.(26)
Currently, the L&I contract with WSLC pays for two full-time and one
part-time staff positions. Salary costs are the bulk of the contract's cost
to taxpayers.(27)
L&I calls its contract with WSLC a valuable partnership, but continues
to provide the same services at a lower cost.
3. Brief summary of other contracts held by WSLC
The WSLC holds three other major government contracts, totaling nearly $5
million.
The U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration contracts
to the WSLC for the Welfare-to-Work Recovery and Work Retention Program.(28)
The purpose of the $4,619,684 contract is to "provide services to assist
substance abusers to initiate and maintain an alcohol and drug-free recovery
lifestyle.(29) Through life-long skill building, personal
empowerment training, job preparation and support services, WSLC and its
partners will assist welfare recipients achieve and maintain life-long self-sufficiency."(30)
Another agency that awards two contracts to the AFL-CIO in Washington is
the State Board of Community and Technical Colleges. This year, SBCTC gave
$75,000 to the AFL-CIO Worker Center of King County and $100,000 to the
WSLC for community and technical college liaisons.(31)
According to Jim Grabbe of the SBCTC, the purpose of the liaison is to
develop a "work plan to acquire a union representative for college
advisory committees."(32) While labor officials
may have legitimate reasons for taking a seat at the table to discuss the
direction of Washington's community and technical colleges, should it really
be costing taxpayers $175,000?
Conclusion
Competitive contracting in the private sector can provide increased efficiency
and quality for taxpayers, and legislators should pursue it where appropriate.
Clearly, the contracts held by the Labor Council are not in the best interest
of taxpayers.
Hans Zeiger, a research analyst for the Evergreen Freedom Foundation,
contributed to this report.
SOURCES
1. Washington State Labor Council. "Legislative Position Paper: Contracting
Out Government Services." http://www.wslc.org/legis/contract.pdf. Jan.
25, 2001.
2. Ibid.
3. Washington State Labor Council. "Services provided by the WSLC."
http://www.wslc.org/services/index.htm, Feb 26, 2002.
4. Washington State Labor Council. "Services provided by the WSLC."
http://www.wslc.org/services/index.htm, Feb 26, 2002.
5. Office of Adult Services, National Dislocated Worker Workgroup. "Quality
Rapid Response Principles." http://www.doleta.gov/usworkforce/documents/tein/x3-01-a.htm
Sep. 2001.
6. Province, Lori. "Washington State Labor Council (WSLC) Monthly
Activity Report." Sep. 2002, p 3.
7. Tusler, Jim. "Washington State Labor Council (WSLC) Monthly Activity
Report." Nov. 2001, p. 2.
8. Tusler, Jim. "Washington State Labor Council (WSLC) Monthly Activity
Report." June 2002, voucher
9. Province, Lori. "Washington State Labor Council (WSLC) Monthly
Activity Report." Sep. 2002, voucher
10. Tusler, Jim. "Washington State Labor Council (WSLC) Monthly Activity
Report." July 2002, p 3
11. Province, Lori. "Washington State Labor Council (WSLC) Monthly
Activity Report." April 2002, p 5.
12. Province, Lori. "Washington State Labor Council (WSLC) Monthly
Activity Report." April 2002, p 1.
13. Department of Labor and Industries. "Project Help Annual Expenses."
Sep. 27, 2002.
14. Project Help. "Project Help: A Cooperative Effort." informational
brochure
15. Department of Labor and Industries. "Project Help Program Evaluation."
1996, p. 6
16. Ibid. Cover
17. Ibid. Cover
18. Ibid. p. 7
19. Ibid. p. 9
20. Ibid. p. 19
21. Ibid. p. 19
22 Ibid. p. 28
23. Ibid. p. 21
24. Ibid. p. 21
25. Ibid. p. 23
26. Smith, Vicky. "Project Help January Monthly Report." Memo
to Doug Connell. Jan. 31, 2003.
27. Project Help. "Project Help: Total Salaries and Benefits."
Sep. 2002.
28. U.S Department of Labor Employment & Training Administration. "Welfare-to-Work
Competitive Grants." http://www.doleta.gov/competitive/round2/wa-514.asp.
May 14, 2002.
29. Ibid.
30. Ibid.
31. Grabbe, Jim. Phone interview by Hans Zeiger. June 11, 2003.
32. Ibid.
The Evergreen Freedom Foundation is a non-profit public policy research
organization dedicated to preserving and advancing individual liberty, free
enterprise and limited and accountable government.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"