Frederic Bastiat was an anti-socialist economist and statesman who lived
in socialist France in the early 1800s. In 1844, Bastiat wrote a satire whose
message is still apropos today. Read his "petition" on behalf of
the candlemakers and other purveyors of artificial lighting.
"From the Manufacturers of Candles, Tapers, Lanterns, Candlesticks,
Street Lamps, Snuffers and Extinguishers, and from the producers of Tallow,
Oil, Resin, Alcohol, and Generally of Everything Connected with Lighting.
To the Honorable Members of the Chamber of Deputies.
We candlemakers are suffering from the unfair competition of a foreign
rival. This foreign manufacturer of light has such an advantage over us that
he floods our domestic markets with his product. And he offers it at an absurdly
low price. The moment this foreigner appears in our country, all our customers
desert us and turn to him. As a result, an entire domestic industry is rendered
completely stagnant. And even more, since the lighting industry has countless
ramifications with other national industries, they too are injured. This foreign
manufacturer who competes with us without mercy is none other than the sun
itself!
"Here is our petition: Please pass a law ordering the covering of
all windows and skylights and other openings, holes, and cracks through which
the light of the sun is able to enter houses. This free sunlight is hurting
the business of us deserving manufacturers of candles. Since we have always
served our country well, gratitude demands that our country ought not to abandon
us now to this unequal competition.
"We hope that you gentlemen will not regard our petition as mere
satire, or refuse it without at least hearing our reasons in support of it.
"First, if you make it as difficult as possible for people to have
access to natural lightand thus create an increased demand for artificial
lightwill not all domestic manufacturers be stimulated thereby?
"For example, if more tallow is consumed, naturally there must be
more cattle and sheep. As a result, there will also be more meat, wool, and
hides.
"Next, if more oil is consumed for lighting, we shall have to plant
extensive olive groves and other oil-producing crops. This will bring prosperity
to agriculture.
"In addition, our waste lands will soon be covered with pines and
other resinous trees. As a result of this, there will be numerous swarms of
bees to increase the production of honey. In fact, all branches of agriculture
will show an increased development.
"The same applies to the shipping industry. The increased demand for whale
oil will require thousands of ships for whale fishing. In turn, that will provide
a myriad of jobs for shipbuilders and sailors. In a short time, we will also
have a navy capable of defending our country. And that, of course, will gratify
the patriotic sentiments of us candlemakers and other persons in related industries.
"The manufacturers of lighting fixtures will be especially stimulated-candlesticks,
lamps, candelabra, chandeliers, crystals, bronzes, and so on. The resulting
warehouses and display rooms will make our present shops look poor indeed.
"The resin collectors on the heights along the seacoast, as well
as the coal miners in the depths of the earth, will rejoice at their higher
wages and increased prosperity. In fact, gentlemen, the condition of every
citizen in our countryfrom the wealthiest owner of coal mines to the
poorest seller of matcheswill be improved by the success of our petition."
Click here to return to the Student
Internship home page.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"