One of the best indicators of whether the extreme political ideology of
Washington Education Association officials is selling well among teachers
is the number who contribute to the unions political action committee,
WEA-PAC. Four elements of this chart have a story behind them.
First is the effect of making PAC donations optional, which occurred in
1994. As you can see, when union officials were forced to ask permission
instead of automatically taking funds, PAC enrollment dropped from 80% to
11% in one year.
The second striking element is how teachers have responded to the exposure
of WEAs electioneering activities. In 1998, EFF began to inform teachers
of the ideology and political goals of union officials. Contributions have
continued to decline.
Third, in 1999 we found some of WEAs claims about enrollment simply
unbelievable. For example, the union claimed that 31% of teachers in the
Everett area were contributing to the PAC, but only 4% of the teachers in
Seattle. This seemed fishy, so we visited key districts to see if one third
of the teachers had actually authorized payroll deductions. We found that
the Everett district simply took money from every teacher on a list provided
by the union. When district officials were asked to produce authorization
forms, only 3% of the teachers were voluntarily contributing.
Finally, after our investigations resulted in districts requiring complete
records of authorization from WEA, the union decided to end its use of school
payroll deductions for WEA-PAC. When teachers are asked to write a check
to support the unions politics, less than ten percent do.
Living Liberty is the Evergreen Freedom Foundation's monthly
newsletter. It provides updates on the issues and projects EFF is currently
working on. You will also find commentary on state and sometimes federal
government issues.
Living Liberty is available for our members only. Please click here if you would like to become a member.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"