When President Bush was elected, EFF was asked to provide his transition
team with several policy recommendations, including information on former
President Clintons executive order related to Project Labor Agreements
(PLA). PLAs require use of union labor and rules on all federal construction
projects.
Based in part on our recommendation, President Bush issued an executive
order overturning Clintons, mandating that all construction projects
receiving federal funding or aid be subject to open bids. This ended the
unions monopoly on federal projects, allowing other bidders to participate
as well. Because of this, Governor Locke was forced to open the bidding
process on the capital dome renovations (earthquake damage) or risk losing
federal funding since he had chosen to make the project a PLA.
At the request of labor unions, a circuit judge initially invalidated President
Bushs order. The U.S. Appeals Court for the District of Columbia,
however, recently reversed the lower courts ruling and upheld the
presidents order.
So what are PLAs and why does any of this matter? A PLA is sold to taxpayers
and elected officials under the guise that by agreeing beforehand to use
union labor and rules, projects will be on time and in budget due to labor
harmony. In other words, labor bosses wont call for a strike.
In practice, PLAs artificially increase the price of projects. The only
real winner when PLAs are issued are the unions.
A Wharton Business School study on PLAs determined that the terms
and conditions in these labor agreements on average actually add 6.8
percent to a projects labor costs. Though estimates vary, projects
built by union-only shops increase costs by anywhere from 5 to 26 percent
over comparable projects built without union restrictions.
When a nonunion contractor chooses to adopt a PLA in order to win a contract,
they are often forced to lay off some or all of their employees to make
room for union workers. If the union is unable to supply all the needed
workers, a contractor is able to hire outside workers with the understanding
that these employees will be replaced as soon as union workers become available.
However, the contractor is still required to pay union representation fees
for nonunion employees retained under a PLA. In addition, a contractor may
be required to pay into long-term union benefit trusts, from which nonunion
employees will never receive vested payments. These mandatory union fees
are in addition to the benefits an open-shop contractor already provides
employees.
The validation of President Bushs executive order banning PLAs on
federal projects makes a tremendous impact. From this point forward, any
project receiving federal funds or aid will be required to be openly bid.
This means a PLA will not be permissible for the Tacoma Narrows Bridge project
or any other transportation improvements if federal funds are used. Thanks
to our recommendation and President Bushs leadership, taxpayers across
the nation will get a financial break.
Living Liberty is the Evergreen Freedom Foundation's monthly
newsletter. It provides updates on the issues and projects EFF is currently
working on. You will also find commentary on state and sometimes federal
government issues.
Living Liberty is available for our members only. Please click here if you would like to become a member.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"