House Democrats released their budget proposal for this year and it blew
away my ignoble contemplation that government should be listed as a dependent
on my tax return. Truly, theirs was a budget written by the gods. Who else
could define and punish a new category of sin? Who else could properly sort
the sinner from the saint. It required an enlightened people, set apart
from us mere mortals.
How would simple people have determined that fish mongers and others who
deal in raw meat by slaughtering animals or wrapping their carcasses for
consumption are not participating in sin and should not face an additional
tax penalty?
Could anyone else have seen that those who sell food for "immediate
consumption on or near a location at which parking facilities are provided
primarily for the use of patrons in consuming the products purchased at
the location, even though such products are sold on a takeout or to go order
and are actually packaged or wrapped and taken from the premises of the
retailer" are blatant abusers and, therefore, must submit to taxing
penalties?
Some Republican and Democrat budget gods have known these things for years.
They had already exposed the sneaky people who partake of "medicines
and preparations in liquid, powdered, granular, tablet, capsule, lozenge,
and pill form sold as dietary supplements or adjuncts." Those furtive
ingrates were slapped with a tax penalty years ago.
But this year, the Democrat budget gods were able to expose a new sin. They
revealed the true and evil nature of candy. Great care was exercised to
determine that this foul substance is a "preparation of sugar, honey
or other natural or artificial sweeteners in combination with chocolate,
fruits, nuts, or other ingredients or flavorings in the form of bars, drops,
or pieces" Unless it contains flour or requires refrigeration.
Flour and refrigeration prevent sin! Who knew?
The Democrat budget gods did.
And they boldly identified the egregious sinners who now will face the grim
penalty of their choices. This includes children who previously hid behind
their mothers' skirts, masquerading as little innocents sucking on sweets.
The new sinners were added to an already large congregation of malcontents,
and new commandments were written to guide them.
Users of candy will face the same judgment as those who partake in gambling
and use alcohol and cigarettes. The wages of sin are taxed!
But the gift they give is more revenue collected to do good and wonderful
things for the people employed by the budget gods.
We can be grateful the budget gods' collection plate, though full, was not
full to overflowing this year, or this sin might never have been
confronted.
The handmaiden of the budget gods, the Department of Revenue, will give
sinners and saints, otherwise known as taxpayers, written instructions on
how to comply with the new commandments. Any attempt to evade the commands
will result in a "further penalty of fifty percent of the additional
tax found to be due."
Some wily candy makers will try to get around the commandments by adding
a pinch of flour to their ingredients, or they will recommend we refrigerate
their evil products. Their strategy will backfire, and those cheaters will
be uncovered and brought to justice.
Still others will buy their sin in a different state, or they will stop
sinning altogether. Then the contents in the collection plate will be reduced
once again, encouraging the budget gods to scour our lives for new sin to
uncover. Milkshakes and fruit drinks, sliced cheese and bakeries that sell
beverages in unsealed containers are on the slippery slope.
Some unrepentant sinners will want to stop this tax increase, but the budget
gods have decreed an emergency, so it cannot be done by mere mortals. It
can only be stopped by rival budget gods.
Let this be a warning: The wages of sin are steep, and so are the taxes
upon it.
Note: This was written before the budget negotiations were final. Hopefully
the rival budget gods prevailed, but the newsletter insert should tell "the
rest of the story." And for you bureaucrats reading this who always
feel compelled to send me gnat-like corrections that are irrelevant to the
big picturelike "it's sexist to say handmaiden instead of handperson"this
is parody . . . humor! You remember humor. If you really feel compelled
to correct me, dust yourself down with flour first and meet me in the refrigerator.
Living Liberty is the Evergreen Freedom Foundation's monthly
newsletter. It provides updates on the issues and projects EFF is currently
working on. You will also find commentary on state and sometimes federal
government issues.
Living Liberty is available for our members only. Please click
here if you would like to become a member.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"