Stewardship . . . on
the road and at home by Jason Mercier
The passage of a state budget balanced without general tax increases was
great news this last legislative session, but it was just the beginning
for EFF. Even before the governor's ink dried on the new budget, we began
laying the groundwork for taking priority-based budgeting to the next levelfor
capitalizing on the recent success to take responsible state budgeting further
both at home and around the nation.
Here are some of the things we've been working on . . .
Other states
Bob Williams has made presentations or chaired panels on priority-based
budgeting for three major national organizations: the National Conference
of State Legislatures, the American Legislative Exchange Council, and the
State Policy Network. These have resulted in calls from lawmakers and policy
analysts from around the nation.
California
No matter what happens with the California recall effort, EFF has already
played a part in shaping the budget debate down there. The two top Republican
candidatesArnold Schwarzenegger and Sen. Tom McClintockhave
both expressed interest in our priority-based budgeting model. We've been
more than happy to provide help and suggestions.
Alabama
The Alabama Christian Coalition, which played a large part in defeating
Governor Bob Riley's $1.2 billion tax increase plan, posted our Stewardship
Project on their website to help make the case for priority-based budgeting
in Alabama. We've also discussed ideas and recommendations with Alabama's
House Minority Leader.
Oregon
Taking a cue from our legislators, Oregon officials approved a massive tax
increase despite the fact that voters rejected earlier attempts. Signature-gatherers
are already working hard to force the issue to a general vote, and the new
increase may be defeated. We've been involved in discussions with Oregon's
Department of Administrative Services about priority-based budgeting, and
they "love" our Stewardship Project. We also held a briefing for
Oregon lawmakers.
Colorado
Bob Williams has been working with Governor Bill Owens' staff and Senate
President John Andrews on ways to implement priority-based budgeting there.
Policy organizations
EFF's sister think tanks in Mississippi, Vermont, Oklahoma, Nevada and Utah
have reprinted parts of our Stewardship Project. Organizations in Oregon,
Maine, Kentucky, and New York may soon do the same.
Media Fox
News Online published an article written by Bob Williams and Lynn Harsh,
and the Seattle
Times published an editorial written by Bob on August 26.
Here at home
We have had many meetings with Washington's Office of Financial Management
(OFM) on how to improve the priority-based budgeting process. We also met
with key legislators recently regarding DSHS's stated priorities and the
refusal of the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction to prioritize
programs.
On September 18, EFF held two briefings for legislators outlining the steps
necessary for long term success in Washington.
Priority-based budgeting is the key to resolving the state's over-spending
problems and building a strong foundation for responsible spending now and
in the future.
Contact: Jason Mercier | Budget
Research Analyst | 360.956.3482
Living Liberty is the Evergreen Freedom Foundation's monthly
newsletter. It provides updates on the issues and projects EFF is currently
working on. You will also find commentary on state and sometimes federal
government issues.
Living Liberty is available for our members only. Please
click here if you would like to
become a member.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"