Your health care choices shouldn't be dictated by govern-ment bureaucrats,
HMOs, or any other third partythey should be made by you and your
doctor. Unfortunately, it doesn't always work that way these days. That's
why EFF is working to help find a cure for our current health care epidemic.
The first step is to understand how we got into our current situation. It
didn't start in the 1990s when state regulations increased dramatically,
though that made the problem worse. No, the problem began decades ago when
Americans began to undergo a slow shift in their attitudes and opinions
about health care coverage. Imagine a whole nation that gradually changes
its diet from whole grains, fruits and vegetables to daily stops at the
fast food joint. Soon, without noticing it, you're at risk for a myriad
of health problems you never gave much thought to before. Such is the case
with the policies governing our current health care system.
During World War II, when the labor shortage hit and cash flow was tight,
many employers began offering health benefits in lieu of a portion of wages.
After the war, health benefits were used as an incentive to entice the best
employees. Then came the Johnson administration and before long Medicare
and Medicaid were household words.
By the time the have-it-all gluttony of the 1980s and 90s rolled around,
health benefits were considered not only a staple of any good compensation
package, but an entitlement. Employees began to think of their health coverage
as a "free" benefit to which they were entitled by virtue of their
employment. And government began to hand out state aid as if it truly was
free to individuals who felt it was their right to receive it.
This shift in the American mind, with all of its resulting policies, is
one of the causes of our current crisis.
What was once a nation of individuals who used health care responsibly and
conservatively during times of crisis has now become a nation of individuals
who demand instant attention for stomachaches and sore throats. While consumers
still pay the costs, they pay indirectly and have been lulled into the belief
that obtaining health care requires at most a small co-pay. The gradual
relinquishment of personal responsibility and control over health care decision-making
has created a system that is now turning on us.
So what do we do about it?
The solution is Consumer-Driven Health Care. Most employers
in both the public and private sectors do not want the burden or the expense
of managing employee health benefits. One of the largest and most important
steps to consumer-driven health care is coming to the realization that our
health care is our own responsibility. From there, we can begin moving toward
a system that provides better quality and cost stability to patients, employers
and taxpayers.
Over the next two years, we plan to put pressure on the legislature (without
lobbying) to push for reform of the current restrictions on health care
coverage. To create this pressure, we are building coalitions within the
state in nine strategic cities, where we will hold public town meetings.
Our intent is to educate business-owners and employees about Consumer
Driven Health Care: how to apply it, how it can stabilize health
care spending, etc. With the help of these coalitions, we can establish
a proven track record of solution-based data to create a basic understanding
of necessary reforms among state legislators.
We will be holding town meetings in Spokane next month and North Seattle
in December. We will be in seven other cities in the first half of 2004.
Keep your eyes on our newsletter as well because we'll be covering many
other practical health care issues.
Ruth Graf is EFF's health care analyst.
Contact: Ruth Graf | Health Care
Analyst | 360.956.3482
Living Liberty is the Evergreen Freedom Foundation's monthly
newsletter. It provides updates on the issues and projects EFF is currently
working on. You will also find commentary on state and sometimes federal
government issues.
Living Liberty is available for our members only. Please
click here if you would like to
become a member.
At a March 23, 2005, House Appropriations hearing on a bill to gut the voter-approved I-601 spending limit, Rep. Jim McIntire (D) asked a supporter of I-601’s two-third supermajority requirement for the legislature to raise taxes the following question:
"Can you name a time when we [legislators] have actually not just set it [supermajority requirement] aside by majority vote? I mean, this is in many respects a procedural motion that has no bearing. It’s a statutory constraint that cannot constrain any legislature that chooses as a majority to set it aside . . . have we ever used a supermajority [to raise taxes]?"